I guess ciggs are just a gateway to another cigg then... 😟

Who are we kidding when we say it's safer to drive drunk vs driving High as a kite.

Yes. The hair will show longer use, but is being researched for short-term readings. And much controversy over the nano limit, just like the blood-alcohol limit. Believe a swab test is also being researched as a possible field sobriety test, now that they can legally take a swab without a court order.

Extreme hyperbole aside (biggest load of crap? Really?) you are taking this A: too personally, and B: completely out of context.

I accept that alcohol is bad. I responded to Robert because he suggested that nobody is talking about alcohol and driving, and that is simply not true. Drunk driving is bad. OK? Can I be more clear?

MY biggotry? You must be stoned now because I am IN FAVOR of medicinal mj.

I didn't mean to confuse you when I stated this repeatedly already.

As for the "charade" I stand by that statement.

Because whenever the issue of medicinal usage is brought up, we hear it from the hemp crowd. I know that doctors support your position, but the general public needs to see them rather than Jeff Spicoli wanna-bees.

And yes. I CAN enjoy a beer or two with lunch and be 100% legal to drive.

And I DO drink beer for the enjoyment of the beverage itself.

Most of my drinking involves a single beer. Zero buzz factor.

Who smokes a joint to taste the bud?

Nobody. That's who. The effect is the goal.

You'd be better served focusing your diatribe on people who are against mj usage rather than taking offense and dissecting the details with people like me who agree with the overall premise of medical mj.

This is an EXCELLENT example of how mj fries the brain.

Who said it was better to drive drunk?

Logic isn't your strong suit, is it?

just get the warm stuff at the liquer store

How is driving after smoking even comparable to driving after drinking 2 beers?

WHAT?

Are you stoned or somethin?

Somebody is.

he he not me Mr. Hand

You Deek.

You say you are for it, yet you put down and stereotype the people that use it? Some people do us MMJ because it does taste good - a lot better than tobacco. Guess you've never heard of edibles that don't involve smoking at all. And yes the effect is the goal the same as smoking a cigar, cigarette, or drinking a beer.

If you only drink beer for the enjoyment of the beverage itself, then switch to non-alcoholic beer. For some people two beers and they are drunk. Individual tolerances are different. And even though you only drink one beer with zero buzz factor as you say, the alcohol still has its effects & impairments just as taking a single toke will. Face it, you drink a beer not just for the taste but also the effect. If you had 2 beers with lunch, left the pub and got in an accident, although below DUI limits the alcohol will make the situation a lot worse as far as the police and insurance are concerned. I find it completely hypocritical when someone says they only drink because it tastes good. Part of the enjoyment of the beverage is the alcohol itself. Otherwise you would be drinking non-alcoholic beer and wine.