Thunder.Gerbil
12 years ago

lol thanx

denali7432 wrote:


😂
dstieger
12 years ago
http://www.cigarbid.com/FORUM/c/posts/607988/p/2/Graycliff-1966-Double-Espresso 


Sorry, Trish.....I thought it was funny....maybe not entirely relevant.....but funny......I knew that pj character looked familiar lol
dstieger
12 years ago
poor guy's panties been wadded up about that greycliff for an awful long time
Porksoda
12 years ago
This is what I dont get. Because the actual manufacturers don't always make gems, it's ok for someone else to get sticks made somewhere else and stick a manufacturers label on it. What? I dont care if it's under license, they are not the cigars they are supposed to be. This isnt a game, this is my money we're talking about. If I buy cigar X, I expect it to at least be made under the supervision of brand X. Not some house blend with a "licenced" label.
Thunder.Gerbil
12 years ago

poor guy's panties been wadded up about that greycliff for an awful long time

dstieger wrote:



Yep, nothing says outrage like ranting on a discount cigar forum about some heavily discounted cigars that one bought from them.
victor809
12 years ago

http://www.cigarbid.com/FORUM/c/posts/607988/p/2/Graycliff-1966-Double-Espresso


Sorry, Trish.....I thought it was funny....maybe not entirely relevant.....but funny......I knew that pj character looked familiar lol

dstieger wrote:



Good find.

Different Philly Jack tho? Did he get banneded once before?

Free Phillyjack and Free Philly Jack!
99cobra2881
12 years ago
Try 5 Vegas they are always made in the cinco viega del la habana factory in Chechnya.
victor809
12 years ago

This is what I dont get. Because the actual manufacturers don't always make gems, it's ok for someone else to get sticks made somewhere else and stick a manufacturers label on it. What? I dont care if it's under license, they are not the cigars they are supposed to be. This isnt a game, this is my money we're talking about. If I buy cigar X, I expect it to at least be made under the supervision of brand X. Not some house blend with a "licenced" label.

Porksoda wrote:



Licensing is tricky. I may come off as somewhat cavalier about the whole thing, but it's an interesting balance.

Lets say for pretend, you're greycliff... you've got a large amount of goodwill associated with your name. That means 2 things, 1- licensing your name is worth a good amount of $, and 2 - You have to be concerned about anything which may diminish the value of your name.

So, dstieger is svedish Match. He wants to license your name to produce a line of cigars... He has to pay you a decent amount of $$ (which means he's likely going to want to put out a decent quality product so that it sells and he makes money back); AND he's got to convince you that he isn't going to do any lasting damage to your name. I'm guessing that in these contracts there is some sort of approval process which has to occur...perhaps they have to sample to the line before releasing it for sale or something like that. I don't know, and none of us will know those details.

But my point is, I have trouble believing that all quality control is gone....
Thunder.Gerbil
12 years ago

Good find.

Different Philly Jack tho?

victor809 wrote:



Nearly identical usernames differing only by a space, same first name, location & identical birthdays listed in their profiles and both are utilizing masonic themed avitars. Dunno, but I'd bet on same.
TrishS@CigarBid
12 years ago


I think one of Sven's responses really nailed it. The Brand Rep doesn't have to know about the product because its not in their portfolio to sell to individual B&M stores. He mentions the licensing agreement then too.

But every few months this type of discussion rears its head. And we're accused of selling 'knock-offs.'

SIGH

Bottom line is that I can type til my fingers fall off. Those who think we're lying thieves will continue to do so. Those who trust us will continue to do so. All I can hope is that those who aren't sure which way to go will read this thread and make their own decision.

I've never intentionally said anything I knew to be wrong. That's how I roll.


Is this the new 500 thread?????
victor809
12 years ago

I think one of Sven's responses really nailed it.

TrishS@CigarBid wrote:




It tickles me that you use "Sven"....
crgcpro
12 years ago
PhillyJack lost his login info and they couldn't help him with it so he had to start all over again with Philly Jack. Same guy.
Thunder.Gerbil
12 years ago
Well Trish, if you'd stop selling knock-offs and fakes, you wouldn't have to spend so much time typing about it, now would you?

Huh. Betcha never thought of that one. Didya?



PS: I laughed at how you referred to him as Sven. Curious, does anyone address him as that around the office?
wapper2011
12 years ago
Ok I don' t post much here on these kinds of discussions, but here is my 2 cents. Unless I am very mistaken I don't see manufacturers like Padron or Fuente licensing their cigars to be re banded, but these two are also powerhouses and do not have too. Companys like Graycliff and Gurhka are not even in the same league as these guys so they do what they have too to make a profit and CI/C-bid can in turn make a truck load of cash doing what they do. Now if I were a cigar maker would I do this? No I would not, but thats just the way I feel and what I think is right.

I'm pretty sure every Graycliff or Gurhka Ive ever had came from here and they sucked, but thats my taste and others may enjoy them. But if CI/C-bid can keep making money this way then more power to them. Right or wrong its just my honest opinion.


And yes my paragraphs, sentence structure, etc are not that good. I tried.. blow me.
TrishS@CigarBid
12 years ago

This is what I dont get. Because the actual manufacturers don't always make gems, it's ok for someone else to get sticks made somewhere else and stick a manufacturers label on it. What? I dont care if it's under license, they are not the cigars they are supposed to be. This isnt a game, this is my money we're talking about. If I buy cigar X, I expect it to at least be made under the supervision of brand X. Not some house blend with a "licenced" label.

Porksoda wrote:




I get what you're saying, I really do. If you think something isn't right, do your homework. If you're still unsure, and have questions, give us a call. We'll help you as much as we can. We're not playing games....we're running a business like so many other companies do. And we don't want you to be unhappy with your purchase.
TrishS@CigarBid
12 years ago

It tickles me that you use "Sven"....

victor809 wrote:




Isn't that his name??? 🤦
TrishS@CigarBid
12 years ago


PS: I laughed at how you referred to him as Sven. Curious, does anyone address him as that around the office?

Thunder.Gerbil wrote:




Other than the CigarBid team? Doubtful. hmmmmm other than me? Doubtful.....

Thunder.Gerbil
12 years ago

Other than the CigarBid team? Doubtful. hmmmmm other than me? Doubtful.....

TrishS@CigarBid wrote:




You know, changing the name tag on his cubicle/door would be kind of funny, and April is just around the corner.
TrishS@CigarBid
12 years ago
Ok kids, its nearly 5 pm. I have a lot of real work to do - not just spending time on a discount cigar forum as TG so eloquently put it.

I'll check back with you tomorrow. You can continue to beat me down until I cry then. But for today, I gots to go....
Porksoda
12 years ago

I think one of Sven's responses really nailed it. The Brand Rep doesn't have to know about the product because its not in their portfolio to sell to individual B&M stores. He mentions the licensing agreement then too.

But every few months this type of discussion rears its head. And we're accused of selling 'knock-offs.'

SIGH

Bottom line is that I can type til my fingers fall off. Those who think we're lying thieves will continue to do so. Those who trust us will continue to do so. All I can hope is that those who aren't sure which way to go will read this thread and make their own decision.

I've never intentionally said anything I knew to be wrong. That's how I roll.


Is this the new 500 thread?????

TrishS@CigarBid wrote:




Ok, your accused of selling knock offs....sigh. Well if you have cigars made at a factory for you and then stick a "licenced " label on it, isn't it a knock off? It wasnt actually made by the original factory in any way shape or form, so how is it not a knock off?
Users browsing this topic