Philly Jack
11 years ago

PhillyJack lost his login info and they couldn't help him with it so he had to start all over again with Philly Jack. Same guy.

crgcpro wrote:


Yeah I'm saying quite on this one don't need a time out
sd72
11 years ago
CBid flooded with licensed DE soon?
Oscar
11 years ago
Oscar
11 years ago
OK maybe some LP9 unbanded "seconds" for only 13.95 ea!
QMPASH
11 years ago
I know a quick way to end this discussion. Go out and buy a cigar. Smoke it. If you like it, buy it again. Keep repeating this process and you won't have to worry about the label(s.) 🌫
opelmanta1900
11 years ago

I know a quick way to end this discussion. Go out and buy a cigar. Smoke it. If you like it, buy it again. Keep repeating this process and you won't have to worry about the label(s.) 🌫

QMPASH wrote:



the problem is that some people have done what you suggested and when they smoked a cigar they really liked and then found it cheaper here, they bought it expecting it to be the same cigar - you know, since it had the same band and everything - but it wasn't...

more of a discussion starter than a discussion ender I would think...
TrishS@CigarBid
11 years ago
So the magic tobacco fairy continuously creates the identical tobacco, year after year, and the taste remains exactly the same.... I think that story begins with "Once upon a time...." and ended with "they lived happily ever after."

Think about it. A lot of cigars are made with small, finite batches of tobacco for the filler, binder and wrapper. If any one element changes, it changes the taste - maybe only slightly or maybe a lot. That doesn't mean they've changes the blend. It means the original tobacco ran out!

I know how everyone feels about Cigar Aficionado but why do you think they taste the same cigar every few years? Why is it that the Macanudo 1968 is so highly regarded while the rest of the line is what it is? Because that year, the tobacco was fantastic. They didn't change the blend.

When you're talking about small batches of tobacco, like Gurkha would use, after that tobacco runs out the taste of the cigar will most likely change with the new tobacco in the mix. Why should they change the band? You're talking about a huge expense.

This isn't rocket surgery guys....

Sheesh
Oscar
11 years ago
I don't get it....
TIGERCDW
11 years ago
I agree with everything you just said Trish.

Mostly this "after that tobacco runs out the taste of the cigar will most likely change with the new tobacco in the mix"

It's true that you can never get the original flavor back when the tobacco runs out.

My question is then,why keep trying to capitalize on the 93 rating that the La Perla Habana Black Pearl Morado
got way back when?

The tobacco blend that received the 93 rating is long gone,but the rating is still being used to promote sales of the current blend.

La Perla Habana Morado received a well-deserved 93-point rating: An attractive cigar with an even draw and perfect burn. It delivers a substantial smoke, rich with profound tobacco flavors and a sweet note on the finish.


http://www.cigarsinternational.com/cigars/11544/la-perla-habana-black-pearl-morado/ 


TIGER
TrishS@CigarBid
11 years ago

I agree with everything you just said Trish.

Mostly this "after that tobacco runs out the taste of the cigar will most likely change with the new tobacco in the mix"

It's true that you can never get the original flavor back when the tobacco runs out.

My question is then,why keep trying to capitalize on the 93 rating that the La Perla Habana Black Pearl Morado
got way back when?

The tobacco blend that received the 93 rating is long gone,but the rating is still being used to promote sales of the current blend.

La Perla Habana Morado received a well-deserved 93-point rating: An attractive cigar with an even draw and perfect burn. It delivers a substantial smoke, rich with profound tobacco flavors and a sweet note on the finish.


http://www.cigarsinternational.com/cigars/11544/la-perla-habana-black-pearl-morado/ 


TIGER

TIGERCDW wrote:



I hear what you're saying Tiger. Its a marketing technique. It's not wrong - that cigar DID at one time get that rating. But your question is for someone else to answer.
gryphonms
11 years ago
Cbid and sister company's simply have to much at stake to even consider selling inferior blends under the same label. One of the reasons they are so large is their integrity. They simply cannot risk their reputation.
Philly Jack
11 years ago
Relationship built upon lies can only end one way
TIGERCDW
11 years ago

Cbid and sister company's simply have to much at stake to even consider selling inferior blends under the same label. One of the reasons they are so large is their integrity. They simply cannot risk their reputation.

gryphonms wrote:




WoW.

Just had my first CBid fanboy sighting.

TIGER
shaun341
11 years ago
Integrity really?
gryphonms
11 years ago
No, just my view of how business works. Having been in B2B sales for a long time you learn integrity promotes customer loyalty, dishonesty loses customers.

There is a large difference between deceptive business practices and old reviews. Though I do agree with you that old reviews should not be mentioned.
shaun341
11 years ago
And does the difference mean one effects integrity and one doesn't. Integrity is always doing what you say not when it convenient for you.
gryphonms
11 years ago
Deceptive business practices are lies. The review is not. You are looking at a fairly standard marketing practice with the review. To me the review does not alter Cbid's integrity. You seem to think that it does. I suppose that is simply 2 different points of view. As I stated above my preference is they do not provide old reviews.
Puffnstuff79
11 years ago
This has been an interesting read for the day...like a good fart
TrishS@CigarBid
11 years ago

Integrity really?

shaun341 wrote:



What are you implying Shaun....as you use Cbid's bandwidth to imply it?
TrishS@CigarBid
11 years ago

Relationship built upon lies can only end one way

Philly Jack wrote:



So you're calling this company liars? Just come out and say it. You'll feel better.
Users browsing this topic