Facedances is weak pop, while It's Hard is a poor man's Who Are You.

Both below par for the Worlds truly best rock band.

But Eminence Front alone is enough to make an album great.

tailgater wrote:

If anyone is eating hot dogs 3 meals a day...every day...for their life...they deserve to get cancer.

This study is garbage science.

DrMaddVibe wrote:

I thought that song was called something else for a long time

.. 😟

DrafterX wrote:

No, Face Dances contains songs that have been staples in the band's setlists since it's release with the exception of ONE song.

Even despite one of the band's member's quote above you still believe it's a great album.

You're an island of one on that.

Sometimes...I think you thrive on stirring the pot.

DrMaddVibe wrote:

Stirring the pot, guilty as charged.

But I'm just offering my well informed opinion on the matter.

Facedances contains songs that are well written but over-produced. Not like quadrophenia's virtual wall of sound, but more like a Justin Beiber hit.

You better you bet? Are you sh*tting me? That was terrible out of the gate, but it was over-played like that damn Start Me UP by the Stones. Terrible Terrible Terrible.

Meanwhile, Roger decided to actually put some emotion into It's Hard.

I've known No War probably still hurts his throat. And Cry if you Want is both catchy and powerful.

But Eminence Front all by itself is the show stopper here.

Neither is their best, and couldn't be without Keith.

So I don't care what Roger thinks. I'm just giving my own opinion on the two albums.

tailgater wrote:

I'm still trying to find my Pete Townsend's SOLO

CD ....It just literally vanished...but the Case is still

there..

the name?

WHITE CITY ??? I think??

it is a great CD,

IMHO...

Mr. Jones wrote: