Adroomi,
I was going to explain my post, but thought you'd figure it out. Especially since someone posted earlier in the thread (regarding the food stamp analogy).
Saddam DID kill his people.
While he lived a life of extreme luxuries, his people starved to death.
He had the power to remove the sanctions by simply following the rules. The fact that he chose to ignore those rules and allow his people to die is NOT the fault of the US.
Further, when the "Oil for food" campaign was operating, very little of the food went to the proper people. True, Saddam didn't take it himself, but his army had the power to distribute it properly.
So, if I fire you from your job, but give you enough money to feed your kids, and you decide to buy a new car instead, was it I who starved your kids?
Foreign policy? True, I'm no expert.
But you should look into a seldom used tool called common sense.
You yourself stated "This puts the leader (Saddam or whomever) in a position to either bend to our rules and demands, or watch his people and country die. "
And we all know which decision he made. Yet you view this as our fault. For reasons only you can imagine, since it is beyond comprehension for anyone with a sense of decency.
Saddam directly killed tens of thousands (perhaps hundreds of thousands) of his own people.
Saddam indirectly killed 1.5 million of his own people (as discussed above).
The US removed Saddam from power.
And in your eyes we're the bad guy.
All I can say is "wow"...