KingoftheCove
10 years ago
Petites are all that's left......................and they'll be gone soon I'm guessing
cigar breath
10 years ago
Thanks for the heads up I just ordered a box of the Petits.

Did the company change hands?
Jrc02005
10 years ago
I've heard good things about the old Camacho cigars, had to scoop a box up myself. Hope they are as good as I've heard.
jimbud
10 years ago

Thanks for the heads up I just ordered a box of the Petits.

Did the company change hands?

cigar breath wrote:


I believe it changed hands in 2008. Check out my thread about the big brands for several poster's thoughts on Camacho. I haven't smoked one with the big band yet, but there is a Liberty that will soon meet its maker sporting the new band.
cigar breath
10 years ago

I've heard good things about the old Camacho cigars, had to scoop a box up myself. Hope they are as good as I've heard.

Jrc02005 wrote:



They were strong, tasty and cubanish. Depends on how well they took to the aging.
KingoftheCove
10 years ago

I believe it changed hands in 2008. Check out my thread about the big brands for several poster's thoughts on Camacho. I haven't smoked one with the big band yet, but there is a Liberty that will soon meet its maker sporting the new band.

jimbud wrote:


The only neon colored Camacho I have tried is the triple Maduro, mainly because I remember reading somewhere that the triple was the only Camacho that wasn't going to be reblended.
Here is my amateur review that I posted here in Nov 2014

Resting for 7 months at 66/67......figured it's time to try this release.

Nice wrapper, tight seams, one barely visible vein.
Canon feels heavy, and is tightly packed...........too tightly I'm thinking.
V-cut = draw too tight.
2nd V-cut perpendicular to first.....draw a bit looser.....but still tight.

(Forgot to sniff it, or check for double/vs triple cap)

Toasted up well, but draw was tight.
Initial flavors are very very similar to the original Camacho Triple Maduro, heavy, thick, oily maduro flavor, and I like that.

No real transitions of any kind that I noticed, but that dang tight draw probably didn't help that.
Burn was good........very slow as you might expect.
Smoke output somewhat less than I'd expect.......again a factor of the draw issue.
At about 1/3 of the way in, I finally gave in and grabbed my poker.......it helped a little.
Finally, during the last 1/3, the cigar opened up, and this was the best part.

The original triple maddie is one of my favorites, and I stocked up (as many did) when word got out that things were going to change at Camacho.
This cigar tastes good enough to fill the void when I ultimately run out of the OR.
I just hope they're all not as tight as this one was.
jimbud
10 years ago
Good review, thanks.
jimbud
10 years ago
Coincidently, I was at a shpo today that time forgot. Bought a couple OR Miamis.
Jrc02005
10 years ago

They were strong, tasty and cubanish. Depends on how well they took to the aging.

cigar breath wrote:



See, that sounds great. I hope they took well, but price was decent enough to take a chance.
kip5166@gmail.com
10 years ago
Had a few of the "new" Dominus, rott. Really liked the older ones. The new one def has the spice, and strength, but was a bit harsh. Will see if some rest does them any good
hnixon12
10 years ago

Okay, so I just had a new Padilla '32. Started out promising as the prelight draw had the classic leather and salt that I used to associate with Padilla. Overall, I found the taste to be largely inoffensive, but I got a lot of charcoal, onion and average tobacco flavor. Nothing special; nothing to write home about. I personally did not like the taste, although the last third was better than the rest. Would I buy it again for, say, $2? No, I have too many other sticks to smoke. Hope this helps. PS I was a big fan of the Pepin 32s -- not at hnixon levels--but a fan.

jimbud wrote:




Pepin Rolled...yummy!
Users browsing this topic