[quote=Whistlebritches]Yes and MACS gives the best........don't let anyone tell you different[/quote]

I know how to play (with) ball(s)... 😰

The Patriots are the only team playing without their starting qb and winning.

[quote=teedubbya]The Patriots are the only team playing without their starting qb and winning. [/quote]

True but, who have they played? Not taking anything away from them but they haven't played the 85 Bears every

game.🍺

[quote=Carib1]True but, who have they played? Not taking anything away from them but they haven't played the 85 Bears every

game.🍺 [/quote]

First, I think you missed TW's sarcasm.

More to the point, the Pats played the Cardinals (went to NFC championship game last year) and a 2-0 Houston team who won their division last year.

85 Bears?

How many times did McMahon and company make it back to the big dance?

Talk about a team shooting their proverbial load.

[quote=tailgater]First, I think you missed TW's sarcasm.

More to the point, the Pats played the Cardinals (went to NFC championship game last year) and a 2-0 Houston team who won their division last year.

85 Bears?

How many times did McMahon and company make it back to the big dance?

Talk about a team shooting their proverbial load.

[/quote]

You Boston/ Pats fans crack me up. The Cardinals just had their jocks handed to them by the Bills. THE BILLS!

Don't get your panties in a wad, bro. Have a little pity on me...I'm a Redskins fan

[quote=tailgater]First, I think you missed TW's sarcasm.

More to the point, the Pats played the Cardinals (went to NFC championship game last year) and a 2-0 Houston team who won their division last year.

85 Bears?

How many times did McMahon and company make it back to the big dance?

Talk about a team shooting their proverbial load.

[/quote]

Still sore about the azz-whooping you guys took from the 85 Bears,eh?lol

[quote=bassman45]Still sore about the azz-whooping you guys took from the 85 Bears,eh?lol[/quote]

Sore. Yes.

From lifting 4 Lombardy trophies since then.

Chicago fans should be embarrassed that those 85 bears couldn't beat a homeless dude with Victors boots after shuffling their way to victory that season.

Their fall from grace, from significance, may never be repeated.

Meanwhile, your happy that your heavily favored team 30 years ago beat the team they were supposed to.

^insert smiley face.

[quote=Carib1]You Boston/ Pats fans crack me up. The Cardinals just had their jocks handed to them by the Bills. THE BILLS!

Don't get your panties in a wad, bro. Have a little pity on me...I'm a Redskins fan[/quote]

The Redskins were my favorite team yesterday.

[quote=tailgater]First, I think you missed TW's sarcasm.

[/quote]

plus there are other teams that have won without their starting QB

[quote=frankj1]plus there are other teams that have won without their starting QB[/quote]

And the Captain Obvious award goes to...

I need a clue.

A raging clue

[quote=frankj1]I need a clue.[/quote]

Rhymes with "stank"

nope, no, that's not it.

[quote=tailgater]And the Captain Obvious award goes to...[/quote]

I love his commercials.

Not the original tho... 😟

Oh the horror! Hope you Pats fans aren't thinking about slicing your wrists or nothing like that, it's just one game.

Tom will be back this morning. I can't wait to see him kick some ass!

The pats did a great job without tommy boy. They have the same record as a few other teams using their back up or rookie quarterbacks over the first 4 games. All of which would have been thrilled if you'd told them they would be 3-1 or 3-0 with a bye.

Kudos to all of them.

[quote=teedubbya]The pats did a great job without tommy boy. They have the same record as a few other teams using their back up or rookie quarterbacks over the first 4 games. All of which would have been thrilled if you'd told them they would be 3-1 or 3-0 with a bye.

Kudos to all of them. [/quote]

hmmmmmmmmm...