Yes and MACS gives the best........don't let anyone tell you different

Whistlebritches wrote:

The Patriots are the only team playing without their starting qb and winning.

teedubbya wrote:

True but, who have they played? Not taking anything away from them but they haven't played the 85 Bears every
game.🍺

Carib1 wrote:

First, I think you missed TW's sarcasm.
More to the point, the Pats played the Cardinals (went to NFC championship game last year) and a 2-0 Houston team who won their division last year.
85 Bears?
How many times did McMahon and company make it back to the big dance?
Talk about a team shooting their proverbial load.

tailgater wrote:

First, I think you missed TW's sarcasm.
More to the point, the Pats played the Cardinals (went to NFC championship game last year) and a 2-0 Houston team who won their division last year.
85 Bears?
How many times did McMahon and company make it back to the big dance?
Talk about a team shooting their proverbial load.

tailgater wrote:

Still sore about the azz-whooping you guys took from the 85 Bears,eh?lol

bassman45 wrote:

You Boston/ Pats fans crack me up. The Cardinals just had their jocks handed to them by the Bills. THE BILLS!

Don't get your panties in a wad, bro. Have a little pity on me...I'm a Redskins fan

Carib1 wrote:

First, I think you missed TW's sarcasm.

tailgater wrote:

plus there are other teams that have won without their starting QB

frankj1 wrote:

I need a clue.

frankj1 wrote:

And the Captain Obvious award goes to...

tailgater wrote:

The pats did a great job without tommy boy. They have the same record as a few other teams using their back up or rookie quarterbacks over the first 4 games. All of which would have been thrilled if you'd told them they would be 3-1 or 3-0 with a bye.

Kudos to all of them.

teedubbya wrote: