... then you won't mind providing the page numbers?
I've literally got the text of the resolution in front of me.

victor809 wrote:

Could you post the picture??8-[

RMAN4443 wrote:

That "green new deal" page was published 5 months ago by some dude named David doonan...

victor809 wrote:

... then you won't mind providing the page numbers?
I've literally got the text of the resolution in front of me while pleasuring myself.

victor809 wrote:

Cant find it right now....this might hold you over:
https://ibb.co/F6mbJHp 

In memory of Andy

dstieger wrote:

Why did you need a picture post too? Hell, you already told us the entire meme. Man... No we have literally nothing to look forward to with it.

victor809 wrote:

This right here is why I just mock people these days...

An argument was posited that AOC's words make no sense.
In defense of that argument, gene provides a large number of quotes which he thinks are from AOCs green new deal resolution (the words bill and resolution were used a number of times).
He is proven to be wrong.

Rather than change his mind, say "oh... I guess she might not be as crazy as I thought" he just wanders off. I'm sure he has not changed his view in any way, despite the removal of the evidence on which he based his views.

No one changes their minds. It's a more worthwhile use of my time to mock people for their views rather than change them.

So... Yeah... Maybe that meme would work better if we put genes picture on it?

victor809 wrote:

This right here is why I just mock people these days...

An argument was posited that AOC's words make no sense.
In defense of that argument, gene provides a large number of quotes which he thinks are from AOCs green new deal resolution (the words bill and resolution were used a number of times).
He is proven to be wrong.

Rather than change his mind, say "oh... I guess she might not be as crazy as I thought" he just wanders off. I'm sure he has not changed his view in any way, despite the removal of the evidence on which he based his views.

No one changes their minds. It's a more worthwhile use of my time to mock people for their views rather than change them.

So... Yeah... Maybe that meme would work better if we put genes picture on it?

victor809 wrote:

So now the stance is it's full of "reactionary assumptions" as opposed to "crazy assumptions"

Well... Life expectancy is declining in the US...
Clean air is an issue for a number of places in the US (just in SF we had unbreathable air for a couple weeks)... "Significant" might be an exaggeration.
Clean water... Hell, wasn't that a whole problem recently in Flint? And west Virginia I think? Again... "Significant" may be an exaggeration.
Healthy food.... Well...that's true. There are things called "food deserts"...
Adequate health care? Kind of a given...
Housing... Also true, maybe an exaggeration to say "significant".
Transportation.... This has been brought up frequently already regarding ID requirements for voting. There is a percentage of our US population which does not have access to transportation due to money. Again "significant" is probably an unnecessary word
Education? Hell... Don't pretend you don't complain about education on this very site. I don't know which level she's talking about, but I know I've seen people here complaining about education... Some of them complaining about the liberals changes to the education system.

So yeah... Other than her use of the term "significant" she's not wrong by saying these things are not available to some percentage of our population.

Significant itself is a throwaway word... It means different things to different people depending on the context. When you're looking at jewelry for the woman, a 20% cost difference may be significant. When looking at a car for yourself, that 20% may not be that significant a difference... 1% mortality rate with a pharmaceutical drug is "significant"...

victor809 wrote: