.... and where have I "attacked" you?

I find it hilarious that you think anything in this thread is an "attack", and at the same time call me thin skinned.

And why would I "discuss" a topic like "Victor is a douche"? That's the most preposterous Tail-Spin you've ever had.

victor809 wrote:

The topic was the referees in the NHL. The "victor is a douche" sidebar was just the inevitable digression once you opened your glory hole to spew your unrelated yet important-to-you "insults".
You somehow twisted it to talk about character flaws that you perceive in me through my discussion of referees.

And when I point out your feeble attempts to attack me, it does not suggest that I'm somehow offended.

You really are off your game.
Everything alright at home?
Need a good towel snapping to set things right?

tailgater wrote:

Mhmm... sure thin skinned boy.
I didn't spew any insults until you started whining that I was thin skinned. And even then all I did is point out that you live in your own little "Tail-spin" world, where you have your own argument based on a view you fabricated.

You want to consider that an "insult" then go on with your bad self.

Nowhere in this thread did I talk about your "character flaws" in reference to your discussion of referees. I don't know a damn thing about referees, so I would have no desire to critique your opinion on them. You perceiving that I did, is again, your "thin skinned" nature.

I wonder some times what it's like to live in your world... where actual things that are written is less important than what you're sure people must really be saying.

victor809 wrote:

OK. My bad.
I said you were thin skinned because you claimed to not understand a couple simple jokes.
I was wrong.
But this speaks volumes about your ability to grasp some simple cbid style humor.

So I appologize that I confused you with a joke.
I didn't grasp the depth of your ignorance.
I won't repeat the error.

tailgater wrote:

OK. My bad.
I said you were thin skinned because you claimed to not understand a couple simple jokes.
I was wrong.
But this speaks volumes about your ability to grasp some simple cbid style humor.

So I appologize that I confused you with a joke.
I didn't grasp the depth of your ignorance.
I won't repeat the error.

tailgater wrote:

Do we need a referee for this?
Where’s Frank???

HEY FRANK!!!!

izonfire wrote:

Uh, yeah.
The jokes were sports related.
Sure.
that's why you didn't get them.

St Louis Blews.
Takes an NHL expert to get that reference.

tailgater wrote:

Ref blowing fouls.
I had to look it up in the sports encyclopedia of difficult facts.

But my apology is accepted.
AND you called my something-or-other massive.
So I got that going for me.

I'm sorry.

teedubbya wrote:

Actually I'm a bassard. Never knew my birth mamma or pappa. I can't confirm or deny the biotch part.

teedubbya wrote: