I think I mentioned it previously.... The grand Marshall for the straight pride parade was notorious homosexual Milo Yannapolis... Definitely wasnt an anti-gay thing...

opelmanta1900 wrote:

The DA is playing politics, Frank.

And the white supremacy angle was played well before the parade began.
It's probably true that the organizers were involved with a group like that. Who else is stupid enough to hold such an event?

But it appears that the parade did not emulate that mentality.

The only violence came from those protesting the "parade".

Calling these protests "free speech" should be embarrassing even for most liberals. You don't embrace free speech by trying to squelch opposing free speech with violence and force.



Side note: I find it odd that you mention the tie to white supremacy but have not mentioned the "protesters" tie to Antifa. Those masked thugs were in the belly of the crowd getting pepper sprayed.

And you haven't mentioned the actions of one of the "Squad" broads. Presley is pushing for an "independent" investigation. Because she doesn't trust the cops or the judge.



Think about this.
A "straight pride parade" was pulled off over labor day weekend in the city of Boston.
And the polarizing impact will be orchestrated by the DA and Squad Presley.

It would be funny if it weren't despicable.

tailgater wrote:

from my earlier quote:

..." but something like 6 are alleged to have assaulted police. The judge has given every indication he will deal harshly with those individuals if the charges are accurate, as he should."

you know we agree about the squelching. But you may be overlooking the entire premise for this otherwise totally unnecessary parade. Take a look at the organizers. This is what they wanted...even if someone got killed.

frankj1 wrote:

...Super Happy Fun America,

frankj1 wrote:

(are Marxists gay?)

frankj1 wrote:

threadjack off

frankj1 wrote:

Question:
Why are the protesters being referred to as "counter-protesters" by the news media?

That implies that the parade attendees were protesters themselves. When the "intent" was to celebrate their straightness.
And yes. That last statement is as stupid as it sounds. But the city didn't give a protest permit to happy clown parade losers. They gave a parade permit.

So those arrested were not counter protesters. they were simply protesters.

The difference is subtle, yet relevant.
And the narrative is consistent.

tailgater wrote:

Parades have to keep moving...

Thought I'd throw my own stupid but true answer into the mix here...

opelmanta1900 wrote:

Parades have to keep moving...

Thought I'd throw my own stupid but true answer into the mix here...

opelmanta1900 wrote:

Parades have to keep moving...

Thought I'd throw my own stupid but true answer into the mix here...

opelmanta1900 wrote:

So.... to throw a kink into it...
In boston, the permit for parades does not appear to be different from any other street/public use permitting.

so from a paperwork standpoint, a protest and a parade appear to be the same?

victor809 wrote:

Ya... I just realized the gayest thing about me isn't my Starbucks order but rather the fact that I've been in a suspiciously high number of parades for a man with a wife and kids...

opelmanta1900 wrote:

Frank,
The parade went off without major incident.
A handful of violent protesters were arrested.
Except the DA doesn't want the judge to charge them.
Based on.....politics.

And Squad Presley is sticking her bias into the mix. Because.....politics.

It's fricken Boston. They won't allow a Chik fil-A take roost yet no nazi's or maga hats were the cause of any trouble.

Forget the the what-ifs.
Look at what's really happening.
The DA is telling the world that it's OK to use violence if your target has viewpoints that differ from hers.
And when the police and the courts say there is proof, the DA and the squad are going to flex their muscle in an attempt to discredit them.
Because...politics.


Sorry.
I thought the parade was stupid before it began.
But it pales in comparison to what our elected officials are now doing.

Not even close.

tailgater wrote:

My great grandfather was the grand marshal of my hometown labor day parade for years.

tailgater wrote:

Question:
Why are the protesters being referred to as "counter-protesters" by the news media?

That implies that the parade attendees were protesters themselves. When the "intent" was to celebrate their straightness.
And yes. That last statement is as stupid as it sounds. But the city didn't give a protest permit to happy clown parade losers. They gave a parade permit.

So those arrested were not counter protesters. they were simply protesters.

The difference is subtle, yet relevant.
And the narrative is consistent.

tailgater wrote: