The CZ looks like a cross between a M9 and a 1911 to me. I like the look of it.

It's hard for me to fathom shooting any gun better than the one I have practiced with the most. It just makes sense to me to have one.

MACS wrote:

I've seen more of those ultra-lightweight Smith and Wesson titanium snub noses for sale cheap with only a few rounds through them. They are simply not pleasant to shoot. No, they're brutal to shoot with carry loads. I don't even like those little suckers. 😣

USNGunner wrote:

True but these lightweights weren't meant to be shot a lot,they were meant to be carried a lot.I have a 642 that's had exactly 5 rounds thru it,I verified it shot center mass at 12 feet with +P ammo about 15 years ago.It's been loaded with that same ammo since but not fired.I like it because it requires no holster...…..I usually carry it in my jacket pocket or right rear hip pocket.It gives you 5 quick rounds for up close and personal business.I have seen a few of these with swollen cylinders but they saw heavy range use...…….they will just not stand up to it.But used as intended one will last multiple lifetimes.

Whistlebritches wrote:

In that context, absolutely. But you're the functional target market and can already shoot. Most of those get sold to some gal in Gander mountain that picks it up and thinks "Oh, that's super light, I like that!" and then goes out to learn how to shoot it. Then it's their only gun. 🤦

I've tossed at least a dozen of those off the firing line at NRA basic pistol classes we've taught. Give them a loaner .22lr, get them dialed in and let them go from there.

I had a 350 lb dude show up with a Kimber Ultra Carry in .45acp. Gun disappeared in that dudes mitts. I was fondling the thing as it was the first one I'd actually got to handle. His first shot was center mass, I was impressed as hell. Until his next shot and all the rest went in the mud. That thing bit the crap out of him. Flinch isn't the right word. LOL.

We put that back in it's case, gave him a Ruger MKI and he did fine after. We told him to take that back to gander mountain, get his money back and get a more user friendly gun.

USNGunner wrote:

Yea those airweights aren't range weapons and most have no idea what they're getting into when they purchase one.

I been looking hard at the Ultra Carry ii in 9mm...…...I've not shot one but I can't imagine it being uncontrollable in 9

Whistlebritches wrote:

I shoot my LCR often, and shoot it well. But I tend to the side of recoil junkie having also owned a Smith 460 and Ruger 480. Someday I'll buy a Smith 500, but I'm waiting for one to come to me.


The ultra carry ii is a very nice shooting carry gun. Had one for a bit.

danmdevries wrote:

I mean I'm thankful as hell that TW is doing well.
But can’t we just go back to hating on him yet???
(and by “we”, and don’t mean everyone on this forum, just everyone in my head...)
____

Oh shoot!!! - this still is the TW thread, isn’t it?

izonfire wrote:

Got the Indy 1500 gun show coming up next weekend. I'm curious to see what follows me home.

danmdevries wrote:

On that note...….have you blown a seal lately Tim?I heard Izon blew a penguin this morning

Whistlebritches wrote: