teedubbya
6 years ago
Again... I hope you are right but don’t get sucked in by her and her bs show. I knew folks that trusted Alex Jones. It’s the same thing.
teedubbya
6 years ago
If she chose a coffee enema as the cure she’d have a nightly barrage of folks that got better using coffee enemas.
frankj1
6 years ago

Again... I hope you are right but don’t get sucked in by her and her bs show. I knew folks that trusted Alex Jones. It’s the same thing.

teedubbya wrote:


...but without law suits from people who had children that were alive but are not alive anymore.
Pudding Mittens
6 years ago
.
Okay, so she's paying actors to lie about having had severe COVID-19 and then having been cured by this drug-pair, something that's pretty simple to conclusively verify via reliable outside evidence (which would thus destroy her reputation and show overnight), and all to push an evil agenda about a pair of drugs working where we have other nearly-identical reports of them working from many other completely independent entities.

Yeah, sounds totally likely. Also you must use Reynolds Wrap for your hat, the cheap store-brand aluminum foil won't block the CIA mind control rays.

It's at this point that I kinda tune you out, sorry.
.
teedubbya
6 years ago
Not what I said. But if that’s what you think I said you should tune me out.

I’m not saying anyone is paid or even that they don’t believe what they are saying.

Are you really that invested in Laura Ingram? I gave you more credit than that.
teedubbya
6 years ago
Wtf with the foil hat crap.
frankj1
6 years ago

Not what I said. But if that’s what you think I said you should tune me out.

I’m not saying anyone is paid or even that they don’t believe what they are saying.

Are you really that invested in Laura Ingram? I gave you more credit than that.

teedubbya wrote:


the investment is in those drugs...but did the news come from her (read:Trump)?

mitts, I can't imagine anyone hoping all these reports are false.
I'm still gonna wait for reports from sources not dependent on audience shares, or beholden to any office holders.
Pudding Mittens
6 years ago
.
It seems you're saying that first-hand video testimony from people who have just lived through something is worthless as long as it appears on any program where decisions about content selection are made by any human being(s), which is all programs in the world. So basically no first-hand reports from anyone have any value, persumably unless you're actually face-to-face with them yourself, in person, completely without any media outlet where content selection is controlled by humans (which is every media outlet) being involved in transmitting the testimonial to you.

Got it! Sounds totally reasonable!
.
frankj1
6 years ago
no, you don't got it at all.
you're taking it like an attack.
izonfire
6 years ago
Reynolds Wrap Is quality foil...
teedubbya
6 years ago
No you really don’t get it but you don’t want to and I don’t really care if you do. It’s all good. Sorry I got under your skin. Didn’t realize how invested you were in her show.

I hope the drugs work and they are rightfully being used as a last resort. We agree on that. Enjoy the angle.
Pudding Mittens
6 years ago

I'm still gonna wait for reports from sources not dependent on audience shares, or beholden to any office holders.

frankj1 wrote:


I've given references to quite a number of these, concerning these two drugs used together. Look back in this thread.
.
Pudding Mittens
6 years ago

No you really don’t get it but you don’t want to and I don’t really care if you do. It’s all good. Sorry I got under your skin. Didn’t realize how invested you were in her show.

I hope the drugs work and they are rightfully being used as a last resort. We agree on that. Enjoy the angle.

teedubbya wrote:


Where is this "so invested in her show" stuff coming from?

I pointed out a guy's first-hand story of being cured by a drug. If it were printed in the New York Times, and I told you guys about it, would I suddenly be "so invested in the New York Times"?

No, I didn't think so. Yet NYT is biased as all hell with content selection.
.
teedubbya
izonfire
6 years ago

I've given references to quite a number of these, concerning these two drugs used together. Look back in this thread.
.

Pudding Mittens wrote:


Yes. You were the first to point out the French study, and there’s been consistently more supporting information since. You’ve been a source of hopeful information. Thank you for that.

We’re all hopeful. But don’t want to be blindly so. However, some are cynical to a fault.
I remain positive, but I don’t know why, after so much evidence of the positive effects of these drugs, there hasn’t been a widespread declaration of it’s success. That’s what has me on edge.

And there seems to be absolutely nothing to gain from a news source peddling false hope in this case...
USNGunner
6 years ago

Reynolds Wrap Is quality foil...

izonfire wrote:



The heavy duty is. The regular stuff, meh. 😳
Pudding Mittens
6 years ago

I don’t know why, after so much evidence of the positive effects of these drugs, there hasn’t been a widespread declaration of it’s success. That’s what has me on edge.

izonfire wrote:


Several factors at play, I mentioned some previously. Primarily:

1. You don't want to be the first news outlet to declare that it works, then be wrong and have egg on your face.

2. The more you point out that it seems to work, the more that dimmer-witted people will wrongly conclude that the burdensome isolation measures aren't necessary any more, which is quite dangerous, at least in the near term.

Both these factors lead news outlets to say relatively little, and wait for harder confirmation (controlled large-scale high-quality study results) before saying much.

Luckily those results are coming. Unfortunately I only caught part of this on the radio while I was driving for groceries today, but if I heard it right, there are apparently 1,100 participants in the controlled study on these two drugs that's happening now in NY, and supposedly it's on day three of treatment. So just hang in there.
.
USNGunner
6 years ago

Yes. You were the first to point out the French study, and there’s been consistently more supporting information since. You’ve been a source of hopeful information. Thank you for that.

We’re all hopeful. But don’t want to be blindly so. However, some are cynical to a fault.
I remain positive, but I don’t know why, after so much evidence of the positive effects of these drugs, there hasn’t been a widespread declaration of it’s success. That’s what has me on edge.

And there seems to be absolutely nothing to gain from a news source peddling false hope in this case...

izonfire wrote:



HOLY CRAP!

Well spoken. Coherent. Reasonable. To the point. No smart arse bullshiite?

WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH RICH! YOU GOD DAMNED POD PEOPLE GOTTA KNOCK THIS SHIITE OFF! WE CAN TELL YOU KNOW!

[ram27bat]
MACS
6 years ago

Sigh MACS go watch msnbc for awhile. You will see them do the same with their interviews. You will call them bunk and know what they are up to.

Now think to yourself. Is it possible fox and Ingram do the same thing? She’s heavily invested in this. She was Trish Regan light on the virus itself and the whole network had to switch their reporting dramatically.

teedubbya wrote:



No doubt about it, they do. Tucker Carlson is unwatchable to me... as is Hannity.

I am aware it is being done. However, like I said, more and more cases like this are happening and I want to hear it from the person who lived it. It is relevant.
izonfire
6 years ago

HOLY CRAP!

Well spoken. Coherent. Reasonable. To the point. No smart arse bullshiite?

WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH RICH! YOU GOD DAMNED POD PEOPLE GOTTA KNOCK THIS SHIITE OFF! WE CAN TELL YOU KNOW!

[ram27bat]

USNGunner wrote:


Sometimes I get dizzy, my eyes roll back, and the words just start to flow.
Sorry...
Users browsing this topic