what's for breakfast, big boy?

frankj1 wrote:

I summarized (in part) the theory as formulated by them. It’s not my opinion or speculation, it’s what they believe.

Critical Theory is an academic discipline in humanities departments. It’s clearly and unequivocally spelled out in numerous books and academic journals. Research it yourself.

It’s very telling how rarely anyone is willing to debate the validity of critical theory and resort to attacking the credibility of the messenger.

HemingwayOcho wrote:

I'm still stunned by him feeling insulted and personally attacked when I said he's breakfast savvy.

frankj1 wrote:

So because you believe Joe to not be a Christian, you automatically make the assumption that there is some other ominous entity that he must be submissive to?

bgz wrote:

Progressivism is a religion, actually a cult, a collectivist culture and as Joe exemplifies it is a religion whose doctrine trumps all others, even his own Christianity. You see devotes among atheists and agnostics as well as anyone else.
There is no room for individual choice, no room for moral codes other than what's PC, no room for questioning or rejecting progressive dogma. The priests of the church and their acolytes in the media will tell you the right way to think, and the right things to say. It is a cult that demands conformity and obedience or you'll be cast out. If they can't convince you with rhetoric, they'll try to force it down your throat by legal means and legislation, the absolute perversion of what law should do.
Go ahead, prove me wrong.

RayR wrote: