Supreme Court nomination · Page 3

Free Fall
Auctions

Specials
Auctions

QuickBuy
Auctions

Newly Added
Auctions

Ending Soon
Auctions

Welcome Guest

Forum Terms & Conditions | My Topics

Smooth light
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#41

Yes indeed.

DrafterX
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#42

I heard Jerry Springer is at the top of Biden's list... 😟

Smooth light
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#43

VP for Candi B sensational.

gummy jones
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#44

It would be the fair thing to do.
Proud to know ya.

frankj1 wrote:

🇨🇮

Smooth light
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#45

Fair,who said politics are fair. Get off the 🎡 you don't have a 🎟️.

MACS
Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter

5 years ago

#46

Skip to the 6 minute mark and listen to Joe Biden in 1992. McConnell did, in 2016, exactly what Joe Biden recommended in 1992... Yeah, the same Joe who is the democrat nominee in 2020. Sooooo... what's the deal, Joe?

Then skip to 8:05 and see what he says later... 1992, don't do it... 2016, do it... now... don't do it.

God, I love that everything is videotaped now. Democrats are flaming f---ing hypocrites.

Edited by user 5 years ago | Reason: Not specified

frankj1
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#47

amazing how dems own hypocrisy

check Graham just two years ago...not 1992.

MACS
Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter

5 years ago

#48

amazing how dems own hypocrisy

check Graham just two years ago...not 1992.

frankj1 wrote:

Little "what-about-ism" there, Frankie-T.

I never claimed the dems owned hypocrisy... Nothing more to say about it other than "But Lindsey Graham?"

S'awright, bruddah... we both know if the roles were reversed (like they were in 2016) dems would do the exact same thing. We wouldn't be speaking of it if Harry Reid hadn't changed things... the reps told him it would come back to bite him directly in the buttocks.

It did.

Smooth light
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#49

Tit to tat,where's my battle ax, got to cut down the hypocrisy tree, again.

Ho ho ho Green Giant🌄.

DrafterX
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#50

Liberal media owns hypocrisy right now... 😟

MACS
Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter

5 years ago

#51

Liberal media owns hypocrisy right now... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

True... true... 😟

tonygraz
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#52

Did they buy it from trump or moscow mitch ?

delta1
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#53

the "same party" argument to distinguish this case from Obama's nomination is ridiculous...every divided party nomination to the SCOTUS before then was considered, regardless of which party controlled the Senate and which party controlled the WH...only a few were deliberated upon and voted down...the vast majority were approved...

McConnell made something up, and decided not to even consider the nominee...established a precedent...which used to mean something in the "world's greatest deliberative body"...

this just exposes the lack of integrity and honor while illustrating the deceit among the GOP leadership...

here's an article that shows the history of SCOTUS nominations

https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/IN10458.pdf

Edited by user 5 years ago | Reason: Not specified

HockeyDad
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#54

Ginsburg should have retired during Obama’s administration but she wanted to have her replacement appointed by President Hillary and that didn’t work out. Then she tried to outlast President Trump and that didn’t work.

The unhappy position the Democrats are in right now is all her fault.

delta1
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#55

they shoulda kept her on a ventilator and tubes for another month...she prolly woulda said yes...

DrafterX
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#56

Hillary is still messing stuff up..... 🤐

HockeyDad
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#57

they shoulda kept her on a ventilator and tubes for another month...she prolly woulda said yes...

delta1 wrote:

That’s what I would have done. Like ****** Cheney when he was VP had that Darth Vader mask to keep him going.

frankj1
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#58

MACS wrote:

I didn't say GOP owned it either, was spreading it out to both sides cuz I made assumptions from this:

MAcS wrote
God, I love that everything is videotaped now. Democrats are flaming f---ing hypocrites.

as usual, we good.

in addition, I am actually of the opinion that it is legal for Trump or other Presidents to to pick candidates in the last year of his/her term, but as when I agreed with Gummy, it no longer seems fair.

Edited by user 5 years ago | Reason: Not specified

ZRX1200
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#59

Nobody said they can’t.

The Senates role is to advise and consent, 29 times a nominee has been named with an apposing senate and twice THATS gone through. The Garland #OUTRAGE was brought to you by a sycophant media carrying water.

delta1
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#60

ZRX1200 wrote:

no hard fast rules for the Senate to "advise and consent" to a SCOTUS nominee...

used to be precedent, past practice/not past talk, would be a factor...

now it's a free for all, and the American people can have a voice on election day

Users browsing this topic

Important Information: