Will Trump concede the election? · Page 2

Free Fall
Auctions

Specials
Auctions

QuickBuy
Auctions

Newly Added
Auctions

Ending Soon
Auctions

Welcome Guest

Forum Terms & Conditions | My Topics

delta1
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#21

where's the evidence or proof that she found 450,000 Biden only ballots?

....................like Trump's dozen's of claims of fraud..................

like the postal worker who swore an affidavit alleging irregularities, only to recant when investigated...

did his admission that he lied about voter fraud get any coverage in right wing media?

the claims are given lots of ink and airtime...then kinda fade away without attention paid when they are proven to be false...but still are believed by cons who wish they are being told the truth

Edited by user 5 years ago | Reason: Not specified

DrafterX
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#22

he denies recanting anything.... says it's fake news.... 😟

DrafterX
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#23

so, what I gathered so far is... Dems aren't denying voter fraud, they're saying you can't prove that there was enough of it to over turn the election.... that's the desperation in Trump conceding.... as soon as he does that the investigations will stop.... until he does the investigations continue.... 🤔

delta1
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#24

Obviously you haven't.

Way to source someone.

The DNC is a terrorist organization.

DrMaddVibe wrote:

whoops...you're right...I didn't check out the story in detail...he mentioned a different allegation of fraud...

I was thinking about a different one...the story of the poll watcher who alleged that poll workers were kept away from the places where ballots were counted in PA...turns out he was a convicted sex offender who exposed himself to young girls

apologies

Edited by user 5 years ago | Reason: Not specified

delta1
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#25

DrafterX wrote:

there's a difference between a few scattered cases of voter fraud vs widespread voter fraud...at the magnitude of a criminal conspiracy among the Dem party, election officials across the nation and the media, as alleged by Trump and his minions

we can agree that scattered cases of fraud happens, affecting both parties ...those people should and often are prosecuted...

but even Trump's appointed experts on voter fraud to the Voting Integrity Commission didn't find evidence of widespread voter fraud in the numbers that would change the result of the 2016 election...

DrafterX
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#26

6000 votes in a Penn county proven fraudulent... excuse was a software glitch... 47 other counties are using the same software..... is that enough scattered fraud votes to change an election..?? 😕

delta1
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#27

don't know, but there are ways to gather up the affected ballots and count them by hand... right?

did the software change every cast ballot to a vote for one candidate over the other?

Edited by user 5 years ago | Reason: Not specified

DrafterX
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#28

yes..... 6000 straight votes for Biden.... not sure how that's human error.... 😟

delta1
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#29

even in a place where Biden won by a 9-1 margin, 8-2 margin, where nearly 100% of registered voters are Dems?

I'm sure we can go back and identify the voters who used the machine at the time of the glitch, and fix their vote if they intended different than what the software program said...hopefully...

do they know whether the software actually "glitched" in the other counties, or just in that place where it was caught?

there was a story circulating that Biden got 138,000 straight votes during the election in MI...that story was debunked...

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/04/technology/biden-michigan-votes.html

DrafterX
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#30

hand count all the battle ground states with proper supervision... and account for all the non-requested mail-in ballots... that's the only way we'll know.... 😟

borndead1
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#31

I'm not buying the fraud accusations, and here's why.

Trump lost the popular vote in 2016 to Hillary F*cking Clinton. Trump is literally less popular than Hillary Clinton. I know a bunch of liberals who even hate Hillary. So how the hell can you claim that Trump actually really won the popular vote in 2020 against a candidate who isn't nearly as hated as Hillary?

Not buyin' it. And until I see judges ordering recounts and people getting arrested, I'm gonna continue to call BS.

DrafterX
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#32

And we would expect anything else..👍

DrafterX
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#33

Ever wonder how to get record turnout voting..?? Flood the streets with ballots... whether they were requested or not... 😟

frankj1
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#34

he lost.
he knows it.
But as folks here like to say...follow the money!

Plenty coming in for him to pay campaign debts and more with new appeals for cash...
And that's the rest of the story.

delta1
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#35

loved Paul Harvey...his short radio bit played during the noon hour...I'd go eat lunch in my car to listen to "That's the Rest of the Story"

DrafterX
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#36

Maybe... Gore didn't concede for 37 days.. we're at day 8... why not let it play out..?? 😕

delta1
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#37

Ever wonder how to get record turnout voting..?? Flood the streets with ballots... whether they were requested or not... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

or elect (with a 3 million vote deficit) a fundamentally flawed fraudulent con-man who was openly hostile to a great majority of American citizens...

he's losing this election by more than 5 million votes ...and counting...

delta1
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#38

Maybe... Gore didn't concede for 37 days.. we're at day 8... why not let it play out..?? 😕

DrafterX wrote:

but it was close, and came down to Florida...one state...where the difference was a few hundred votes, and GOP activists were interfering in the counting process...if that were the case today, with Dems jacking the vote count, I'd say Trump was justified to take it to court and not concede

DrafterX
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#39

Only the media has called this election... 😟

delta1
Herf-A-Holic

5 years ago

#40

no one griped when the media "called " all the past elections, including in 2016, about 6 hours after the polls closed...

these "media called" elections were predicted by mathematical probabilities given the numbers of tabulated ballots and the number of uncounted ballots...I do agree that maybe it's not a good idea for the media to predict the outcomes, because that could have a chilling affect on voters on the western side of the US...maybe we should wait until all the votes are counted...

has there ever been, in our lifetimes, a "called" election that had a different result when actually certified?

Users browsing this topic

Important Information: