^^^^^

I think the opposite, Frank. I think Guilani, the con man, is distancing himself from her because she said CIA one too many times. She has implicated both Republicans, Democrats and the CIA as well as foreign governments and entities. True or not, we may never know, but they definitely don't like what she is saying--none of them. I would love to see what she has or hasn't uncovered before she has an "accident".

Ultimately, Guiliani doesn't want to get to the truth, he wants his 20,000 dollars a day to be Trumps lead attorney. Remember, this is the guy who helped cover up 9/11.

The truth here could potentially expose the fact that the American peoples vote is worthless, and has been for who knows how long?? Imagine if the American people ever woke up to the fact that it's a selection, not an election?

I think this will be buried, deep.

FoR rEaL. Lol!

RobertHively wrote:

I know you've posted that you aren't allowed humor...or something equally weird, but can you laugh at yourself now?
even Rudy won't touch her with his dye stained fingers.

at some point would you be big enough to admit that one of the great con man closers ever snookered you?

frankj1 wrote:

I don't know what you're talking about Frank, you obviously didn't understand what I wrote.
Your TDS keeps getting in the way...orange man bad and all. You're so obsessed with that lefty narrative that you can't see the forest for the trees.

RobertHively has got it much closer to the truth of the matter, but your only response to him was more of that obsessive lefty narrative. Emancipate yourself Frank!

RayR wrote:

.....................

I smile sadly when thinking about all you don't know of my life. I'll assume the same of most with whom you've crossed paths.

frankj1 wrote:

you walk in already knowing that everyone not in lock step with you are all of the same mind. you are unable to conceive of nor account for the many differences from your dogma that exist. There is only one reason anyone could not worship at your feet...Commie Progressives have taken hold of our senses.

It's become exhausting.

Evidently I'm just another head nodding group thinker like all others not wowed by your insights. You speak more for me than I do, so I guess you don't need me to state opinions since you are better at it than am I.

I smile sadly when thinking about all you don't know of my life. I'll assume the same of most with whom you've crossed paths.

frankj1 wrote:

Ahhhhhhh, the sad smile.
Very few left on this earth that can pull that one off.

Papa.
One of the greats...

izonfire wrote:

It's become exhausting.

frankj1 wrote:

Ray Ray, there is a point not being mentioned here. Each and everyone of us has an absolute right to form and follow our own path. No matter who is in power we have no fear of government reprisal. And that my friend is why America was, is, and will always be great. There is no where else I would ever live, no matter how I joke about that.

Speyside wrote:

Frank, I only follow what you write. Trump the "great con man closer", Rudy "with his dye stained fingers", "The real threat to our voting is from the gang soon to depart Washington D.C." Your words, not mine. Bland accusations and not much else. It's as if you're a blaming Trump Inc. as the singular threat to your sacred democracy and dismiss the Dems many evils as if they are innocent as the driven snow.
Isn't your obsessive partisan hate blinding you? Talk about exhausting! No wonder you see any criticism as condescending and not worth considering.

What if your sacred democracy is a farce? The money shot in Robert's post was "The truth here could potentially expose the fact that the American peoples vote is worthless, and has been for who knows how long?? Imagine if the American people ever woke up to the fact that it's a selection, not an election?":-k

RayR wrote:

My accusations have rapidly growing judicial opinions behind them, not to mention decades of behaviors in the business and personal life of this POTUS. He does not think nor care that he lost the election, he is scrambling to disregard the will of the people and stay in office. It's been done elsewhere.

Still waiting (as are the courts) for something of substance from Team Trump or from you with anything close to the same support upon which to base an opinion.

Another thing you have wrong about me, I have no hate in my heart. These are opinions. Being against a path does not mean I believe in its destruction. I have always encouraged opposing views. I pushed you to stay and talk about your views. But I push back against one sided dogma as an exchange of ideas never really happens with you.

I have posted a number of times over the years what my father taught me:
do not wish to get everything you want, because then you will be on the side of a dictator and half of your fellow countrymen will be oppressed. By definition, there can not be a benevolent dictator as it destroys the basis of democracy and freedom

Why do you feel the need to repeatedly put down democracy and it's adherents?
It makes me go back to when I inferred from your older posts that you were a one-party rule kind of guy. Back then, you shrugged it off by saying the two parties were really one and the same, but since then you have been as staunch an advocate for the GOP as we've ever seen here. Are they that one-party rule you support?

frankj1 wrote:

...... I don't think we can all fit in Montana.

frankj1 wrote: