Stogie1020
5 years ago
Stinger, I feel like you and I are in agreement on this...

When D's not only accepted but frankly condoned and excused violent extremist behavior by BLM and Antifa, they told the world "The left does not care if you loot, burn, attack federal buildings and attack the police".

As soon as violent and extremist R's do the same stuff, suddenly now it's a problem.

I am not in any way condoning what happened at the Capital anymore than I care to excuse what happened at the Portland Federal Courthouse. Frankly, it should have been a problem all along and everyone (D's and R's) should have enthusiastically gone after the extremists at all junctures.
Smooth light
5 years ago
Seen alot of trump rallies in four years, this is the first one with, backpack, helmets, weapons and dress in black. Could it possibly be a set-up maybe?

Now all we have is 🤡's running around looking for goats to f*ck.
delta1
5 years ago
If Scalise was honest, he would have denounced Trump for stirring up the invasion of the Capitol by his supporters...then voted to impeach


Trump's defenders show a droopy eye to his encouragement of white nationalism and incitement of violence...they do so by saying he never actually uses those specific words...the vagueness is intentional...his peeps understand the "code"


"knock the crap outta him" "but don't hurt him too much, don't worry, I'll defend you" mighta been the only time he was specific, but he has said so much numerous times since then...



in the weeks leading up to the Jan 6 "Stop the Steal" rally, Trump and his minions openly invited his followers to attend the "wild"

https://www.newsweek.com/trump-encourages-wild-protests-dc-date-electoral-college-vote-count-1556153 
RayR
5 years ago
Wokie Jo lost me about 10sec, in when he said "sworn duty to uphold the constitution".
Stogie1020
5 years ago

If Scalise was honest, he would have denounced Trump for stirring up the invasion of the Capitol by his supporters...then voted to impeach


Trump's defenders show a droopy eye to his encouragement of white nationalism and incitement of violence...they do so by saying he never actually uses those specific words...the vagueness is intentional...his peeps understand the "code"


"knock the crap outta him" "but don't hurt him too much, don't worry, I'll defend you" mighta been the only time he was specific, but he has said so much numerous times since then...



in the weeks leading up to the Jan 6 "Stop the Steal" rally, Trump and his minions openly invited his followers to attend the "wild"

https://www.newsweek.com/trump-encourages-wild-protests-dc-date-electoral-college-vote-count-1556153 

delta1 wrote:



Delta, the Left entirely embraces this too. Watch the video posted to Don Jr.'s twitter page here to see the left using the same (or worse) inflammatory rhetoric for the months leading up to present.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/video-shows-democratic-leaders-liberal-pundits-cheering-and-condoning-violence-against-political-opponents 
teedubbya
5 years ago
They were specifically sent to the capital to stop the certification of the electoral college. By the President following continual lies about a stolen election. That’s sort of odd and unusual and hard to blame on someone else if you believe in personal responsibility.
teedubbya
5 years ago
And yes the rioting this summer was wrong.

But cmon man...
HockeyDad
5 years ago
I thought we were blaming it on Trump.

Wouldn’t taking personal responsibility be blaming the rioters for the rioting?
HockeyDad
5 years ago

And yes the rioting this summer was wrong.

But cmon man...

teedubbya wrote:



It has already been determined that the rioting this summer was not wrong. We’re not revising that history.
teedubbya
5 years ago
Each for their part yes. It’s not complicated. It really isn’t.
teedubbya
5 years ago
I don’t know what you are talking about HD. Peaceful protesting is ok, rioting is not. Rioting is not peaceful protesting and should be fully prosecuted. That’s pretty much agreed to by most even if some do t want to believe that for political purposes.

You can condemn both without justifying either. Why is this so complicated to some?
HockeyDad
5 years ago
It might be because the rioting last summer wasn’t fully prosecuted. It was barely prosecuted.
rfenst
5 years ago
What happened this summer vs. the attack on Congress are two entirely different matters. Attack on the federal building while wrong, pales in magnitude to the attack on Congress.
DrafterX
5 years ago
it was barely called rioting.... the liberal media is sickening sometimes... 😟
teedubbya
5 years ago
Ok now that we’ve settled that the liberal media is sickening maybe we can really take a look at the insurgency that just occurred and we seem to not want to talk about.
RayR
5 years ago

it was barely called rioting.... the liberal media is sickening sometimes... 😟

DrafterX wrote:



Only sometimes?:-k
teedubbya
5 years ago
Rfenst some will never see that. Intentionally.
DrafterX
5 years ago

What happened this summer vs. the attack on Congress are two entirely different matters. Attack on the federal building while wrong, pales in magnitude to the attack on Congress.

rfenst wrote:



what does the law say about trespassing on Federal property... does the law define the Capitol as the worst place you can be stupid at..?? 😕
HockeyDad
5 years ago

What happened this summer vs. the attack on Congress are two entirely different matters. Attack on the federal building while wrong, pales in magnitude to the attack on Congress.

rfenst wrote:



It pales in magnitude because of the embarrassment of having a Viking seize the Capitol Building.
teedubbya
5 years ago
Users browsing this topic