You're the one getting bent about someone else's policy about how they conduct their business. That shows you are offended. I didn't look into your claims, I didn't look in to see if any other company is doing it... I literally don't give a flying f*ck what they do. IMO, it's their company, they can do what ever tf they want.

You call me "woke"... which seems to be the common defense for white people to justify their racism. Woke would imply that I incessantly think about race... I prefer to read about science, mathematics and other equally nerdy sh*t... but to each is own... if you want to let race dominate your brain, you do you.

Why would I block or otherwise ignore your post? It's more fun to be the contrarian here, and I look forward to the discord that follows... er discourse... yes... I meant discourse.(For the record, I've only blocked one annoying account... everyone knows which one it is... and have never reported anyone).

bgz wrote:

you meant pantloads, right?

eventually ray will understand what I say about Libertarians vs neoLibertarians (him). He's still worshipping them corporate guys...cuz they are in business to respond to the markets' needs and wants ONLY!
HA!

frankj1 wrote:

Hmmm. Must have missed those posts. I haven't been keeping up with the Cbid soap opera like I should...

RobertHively wrote:

You have certainly proved my point. If you have noticed, when I post satirical items, I make no comments. You guys pick up the mantle and run with it. With regards to the actual article about UA, you may not care about any of the things that go on in corporations, and that is your right. Just because I posted it, you labeled me a racist and you don’t know one thing about me.

You may be too young to remember, but it was during my generation that the modern, day fight for civil rights began in earnest. The leaders fought to right the wrongs of the past and bring together our nation. Here comes a new movement to perpetrate the same wrongs of the past but on the other side. Seems like we are going from one extreme to another. Martin Luther King, Jr., said he longed for people to be judged by the content of their character, not the color of their skin. Based on your response, you find this to be wrong? We should focus on color and not our common humanity?

Presently, treasured free speech is canceled if it doesn’t agree with the new woke trends. There was a time when all of us could talk, debate and certainly disagree without the vitriol you display in your post. I recommend you block me.

Burner02 wrote:

Come join the party... being blocked has it's advantages.

Smooth light wrote:

It’s kind of weird all the whites vs blacks threads popping up in here in the name of not seeing color.

teedubbya wrote:

They say a good portion of the male population are color blind...

bgz wrote:

I went back up and read... I didn't call you a racist... I was pretty sure I didn't..

bgz wrote:

Step one to not being a racist... don't post sh*t like this.

bgz wrote:

... which seems to be the common defense for white people to justify their racism.

bgz wrote: