frankj1
4 years ago
Rushdoony
North (Rishdoony's son in law)
Ron Paul...

apparently this is ray's religious/political/reconstructionist Holy Trinity.

Why wait for Jesus to return (never mind CelticBomber)? They can do it now on Earth, or at least thought so.

Can you imagine being so nuts that even Falwell was askeered?

here's a tidbit of what pissed them off when criticized by Falwell followers:
"Among Reconstructionism's highlights, the article cited support for laws "mandating the death penalty for homosexuals and drunkards." The Rev. Rushdoony fired off a letter to the editor complaining that the article had got his followers' views all wrong: They didn't intend to put drunkards to death."


YAY! I get to live to drink another day.
borndead1
4 years ago

Rushdoony
North (Rishdoony's son in law)
Ron Paul...

frankj1 wrote:



I was a huge fan of Ron Paul for a long time, because of his anti war/anti drug war/anti corporate welfare views. I even Stanned for him.

But over the years, it became obvious that he is either: completely incompetent, dosen't care that he attracts (and employs) bigots, or he is just a plain old bigot himself who has been fortunate enough to not be caught on video. And at this point, I don't care which of the three it is.

And anyone who supports Gary North is no better than The Taliban. They just worship a different god.
frankj1
4 years ago

I was a huge fan of Ron Paul for a long time, because of his anti war/anti drug war/anti corporate welfare views. I even Stanned for him.

But over the years, it became obvious that he is either: completely incompetent, dosen't care that he attracts (and employs) bigots, or he is just a plain old bigot himself who has been fortunate enough to not be caught on video. And at this point, I don't care which of the three it is.

And anyone who supports Gary North is no better than The Taliban. They just worship a different god.

borndead1 wrote:


there was a time when I thought Ron Paul might be worth support.
I had been listening to a fellow named Gene Burns on local radio, Libertarians were kinda new...
I was wrong.

Gene Burns decided he was also wrong before he died.

You and I are likely not of the same mind much of the time, but here and there our thoughts on certain things are not mutually exclusive despite different starting points. But these three guys are/were carrying psychotic thoughts that mix American politics and God appointed weirdness.

This is not conservativism nor Libertarianism...not even religion. And certainly not American.
borndead1
4 years ago

This is not conservativism nor Libertarianism...not even religion. And certainly not American.

frankj1 wrote:



But these mfs consider themselves American Libertarians; supporters of 'religious freedom' and such (as long as it's Fundamentalist Christianity).

I refer to my posts on another thread. Would you REALLY want your religious views made law and forced on everyone?

For you and I, the answer is no. For them, the answer is f**k yes. There is no compromising with these people. They are the mirror image of the liberals they talk so much sh*t about. They want big government just like liberals do; they just want a different form of big government.

ZRX1200
4 years ago
BD1 I think it’s easy to get bogged into ones deeply held mindset.

The political pendulum has been pushed not swung naturally and I think you see elements or big R’s moving to big L because of the corporate take over of the two major parties. I see plenty of traditional big R stuff on libertarian social media posts and scratch my head.

I think it’s the same reason Cheeto got elected.
ZRX1200
4 years ago
I enjoyed listening to Free Talk Live for quite some time simply because it took me out of my comfort zone. Until they started talking about no age of consent and then I tuned out.

Everyone’s hypocrisy only goes so far and people will congregate where they feel comfortable. Especially now. Not enough people are ok with being wrong (at least for even a conversation) so IMO it’s the new hang out.
8trackdisco
4 years ago

I remember when Gary North was testifying in the Iran-Contra hearings.

HockeyDad wrote:



That was Gary Condit. He's since gone missing.
Speyside2
4 years ago
That was Oliver North, I imagine you already knew that when you posted. It did give me a good laugh.
RayR
4 years ago

there was a time when I thought Ron Paul might be worth support.
I had been listening to a fellow named Gene Burns on local radio, Libertarians were kinda new...
I was wrong.

Gene Burns decided he was also wrong before he died.

You and I are likely not of the same mind much of the time, but here and there our thoughts on certain things are not mutually exclusive despite different starting points. But these three guys are/were carrying psychotic thoughts that mix American politics and God appointed weirdness.

This is not conservativism nor Libertarianism...not even religion. And certainly not American.

frankj1 wrote:



So you expect me to believe that before you and BD1 went to the dark side that you were a libertarian? 😂
We call fair-weather friends like that at best left-libertarians, you are only libertarians to a point, single issues like anti-war, anti-drug war, anti-corporate welfare maybe, things you have an emotional connection to..but beyond that, it's off to cuddling up with the dark side of the left or to the Neocons and Straussians.
And you thought that the libertarian thing was something new? 😂 You've only convinced me that you know NOTHING about history, classical liberalism, libertarianism, or even what real conservatism is about!
Frank, can you define what American is, and while you are at it please define what a woman is?? Inquiring minds want to know.

You probably avoid the daily RonPaulLibertyReport because it takes you out of your comfort zone because he and his cohosts and guests have been right on everything...COVID, the FED, the MOLECH STATE, FOREIGN POLICY, and let us not forget Biden and his progturd followers.
HockeyDad
4 years ago

That was Oliver North, I imagine you already knew that when you posted. It did give me a good laugh.

Speyside2 wrote:



That was Oliver? That’s a Twist.
frankj1
4 years ago

So you expect me to believe that before you and BD1 went to the dark side that you were a libertarian? 😂
We call fair-weather friends like that at best left-libertarians, you are only libertarians to a point, single issues like anti-war, anti-drug war, anti-corporate welfare maybe, things you have an emotional connection to..but beyond that, it's off to cuddling up with the dark side of the left or to the Neocons and Straussians.
And you thought that the libertarian thing was something new? 😂 You've only convinced me that you know NOTHING about history, classical liberalism, libertarianism, or even what real conservatism is about!
Frank, can you define what American is, and while you are at it please define what a woman is?? Inquiring minds want to know.

You probably avoid the daily RonPaulLibertyReport because it takes you out of your comfort zone because he and his cohosts and guests have been right on everything...COVID, the FED, the MOLECH STATE, FOREIGN POLICY, and let us not forget Biden and his progturd followers.

RayR wrote:


Truthfully, I expect very little of you...but your leaks are now oozing, like pus.

You have only yourself to blame for the unwashed now pecking away at your hatred...you dropped bread crumbs for months and I finally just printed out where the clues led. But I knew, as did others, early on. You aren't our first.

BD and I aren't on the same political page, we just have common ground sometimes. Not surprisingly people like him and me find you and your pal Gary to be professing just another version of sharia law...and it is ugly.

These common ground discoveries happen here on cbid and in America frequently among those wishing to understand apparent opposition.

It's a great place to live.
RayR
4 years ago
Pity talk, sissy lefty talk about "oozing" and making stupid baseless assertions that a good Christian man was "professing just another version of sharia law". Why? Because he was studying them words that are in your own Old Testament ? I guess just by reading those words you become an acolyte for stoning or some stupid chit like that? DAMN!

Com'on Frank! Answer the question! What's an American? We un-American types as your say want to know.
I'll let you go on the "What's a woman" question because I know you're not a biologist.
frankj1
4 years ago
are you actually denying in public that North, one of your mentors, said death is required for homosexuality (and a few other "crimes")?

What's gonna ooze out next, reynard?
Are you late in paying your Westboro dues, dude?

It's out, now. It can't be stuffed back into your bottle.
ZRX1200
4 years ago
To be fair, death is required for everyone.
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
4 years ago
Ray just wants it to come a little sooner for...

Well, pretty much anyone and everyone. There is very little room in the world of RayRay for disconcerting views, all must be punished!!!

Speyside2
4 years ago
^ So are you going to throw the first stone? Maybe you could get one of those criminals that attached the federal building in Portland.
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
4 years ago
Me throw the first stone?

I'm not the one trying to get everyone stoned here... gtfo my stash... my stash.

ZRX1200
4 years ago
They were attached?
Speyside2
4 years ago
LMAO!! You got your post up before mine! That was for the post preceding yours.
Sunoverbeach
4 years ago
I hate people who use big words just to make themselves look perspicacious.
Users browsing this topic