I watched, I've seen him once or twice before and expected far worse from this.
Glad to be surprised...thanks.
and here's the "But"...
Couple of takeaways from it:
1- the only actual accusation of nefarious acts was also the only time he said that the part he just presented was "unverified" and to take that as it is, and
2- he said that the fact that this had all been caught, publicized, and acted on actually was good because it proved the system worked.
3- somewhere in there it sounded like these ballots would not have been counted due to the system in place and state laws in PA.
Innuendo of what could possibly happen and Rudy-style conspiracy lies are a lot different than proof of coordinated election fraud actually having happened, as 60 out of 61 courts have said.
Get the evidence.
frankj1 wrote: