Abrignac
2 years ago

Oh I’m gonna name call…..

ZRX1200 wrote:



Good. You haven’t changed. The world needs assholes like you and I. Have to balance out the nice guys somehow.
DrMaddVibe
2 years ago

1.
That’s the approved narrative

2.
Speculation

3.
Ok

4.
Might wanna revisit the timeline….

5.
Don’t completely disagree, but the people who hate him are just as infatuated some willingly some conditioned. And that brings me to, there’s no difference between those three groups. Remove him from the equation, the things that have been done are far more treasonous than loud obnoxious visitors with a smattering of violent people.

And I’m not talking about one day I’m talking about starting from illegally surveilling a political opponent.

You care more about Cheeto than I do. (Not an attack on you btw).

His rise shouldn’t be a shock if you have a basic understanding of base human reactions. People hate the government. Their side is either good or less bad, and somehow….both sides are fed up with how they’re wronged. It’s almost like a perfect storm where people naturally opposed to a shifting change back to where we should be because they’re too afraid of the other guys.

So you get a candidate that’s smart enough and in touch enough to know how to not sound like he’s a schill for either team and yet continue the pep rally against one of the squads. Then the whole time in office the majority of his policies were Clinton/Bush/Obama esque.

This is really amazing stuff. And the manipulation of our population is still an afterthought.

ZRX1200 wrote:




Preach it.


However...

J6 Committee Admits Its Show Trials Were An Election-Year Publicity Stunt



Key members of the Jan. 6 Committee admit in a new PBS documentary that the operation was an election-year publicity stunt.

Key members of the since-disbanded Select Committee on January 6th admit in a new PBS documentary that the entire operation was an election-year publicity stunt.

On Wednesday, Frontline PBS published a new documentary, “Democracy on Trial,” chronicling the House committee’s work. Pivotal players on the partisan probe conceded in the two-and-half-hour documentary that the panel’s public performances produced for prime-time television were orchestrated as entertainment media.

“The one thing that we knew was the information that we have is compelling,” said Illinois congressman-turned CNN commentator Adam Kinzinger. “The thing we needed to do was tell that to the American people in a compelling way.”

The Jan. 6 Committee turned to former ABC News President James Goldston to produce their hearings that occurred just months before the 2022 midterms. The panel also hired another producer whose résumé included stints at Bloomberg, ABC News “Nightline,” and “Good Morning America.”

“I got a call pretty much out of the blue from the January 6th committee,” Goldson told the documentary. “They wanted a storyteller.”

“While they were brilliant lawyers,” Goldston added, “storytelling for a mass audience is not what they do.”

“To bring in a guy like this who would think outside the box really did prove to be fruitful,” Robert Draper of New York Times Magazine tells the PBS documentarians. “It was Golston who really began to envision this as in a way a kind of miniseries that there would be sort of nine episodes and that these episodes would tackle particular themes.”

The first episode in the summer series ultimately pulled dismal ratings despite the committee’s biggest fans attempting to encourage viewership with free ice cream watch parties. Months before the season premier, House Democrats conceded the committee’s investigation was central to the party’s plans to maintain the majority in the November midterms.

“Jan. 6 committee faces a thorny challenge,” read a March 2022 headline from the Washington Post: “Persuading the public to care.” The article continued, “They hope their recommendations to prevent another insurrection will be adopted, but also that their work will repel voters from Republicans who they say helped propel the attack.”

The Soviet-style committee eventually became the legacy project for ousted Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney, who served as vice chair of the panel. By August, Cheney’s futile bid for re-election among one of the nation’s most conservative electorates was characterized as a “Kamikaze Campaign” by New York Magazine. Cheney overwhelmingly lost her effort for a fourth term and published a memoir last December. In the book, Cheney reflected on the committee’s hiring of Goldston to dramatize the hearings to boost Democrats’ electoral prospects.

“He came on board and brought with him a number of individuals with years of experience in network news,” Cheney wrote. “Goldston and his team were exceptionally helpful in facilitating that type of presentation. And our outline for each hearing — which took the form of a trial presentation — closely paralleled that structure.”

https://thefederalist.com/2024/02/01/j6-committee-admits-its-show-trials-were-an-election-year-publicity-stunt/ 


Oh how it was swallowed up by the "Must See TV" crowd. Biscuits meet gravy.

The irony

?si=ZXGleZY_SljCu6iX


The iron...eee
8trackdisco
2 years ago

Preach it.


However...

J6 Committee Admits Its Show Trials Were An Election-Year Publicity Stunt



Key members of the Jan. 6 Committee admit in a new PBS documentary that the operation was an election-year publicity stunt.

Key members of the since-disbanded Select Committee on January 6th admit in a new PBS documentary that the entire operation was an election-year publicity stunt.

On Wednesday, Frontline PBS published a new documentary, “Democracy on Trial,” chronicling the House committee’s work. Pivotal players on the partisan probe conceded in the two-and-half-hour documentary that the panel’s public performances produced for prime-time television were orchestrated as entertainment media.

“The one thing that we knew was the information that we have is compelling,” said Illinois congressman-turned CNN commentator Adam Kinzinger. “The thing we needed to do was tell that to the American people in a compelling way.”

The Jan. 6 Committee turned to former ABC News President James Goldston to produce their hearings that occurred just months before the 2022 midterms. The panel also hired another producer whose résumé included stints at Bloomberg, ABC News “Nightline,” and “Good Morning America.”

“I got a call pretty much out of the blue from the January 6th committee,” Goldson told the documentary. “They wanted a storyteller.”

“While they were brilliant lawyers,” Goldston added, “storytelling for a mass audience is not what they do.”

“To bring in a guy like this who would think outside the box really did prove to be fruitful,” Robert Draper of New York Times Magazine tells the PBS documentarians. “It was Golston who really began to envision this as in a way a kind of miniseries that there would be sort of nine episodes and that these episodes would tackle particular themes.”

The first episode in the summer series ultimately pulled dismal ratings despite the committee’s biggest fans attempting to encourage viewership with free ice cream watch parties. Months before the season premier, House Democrats conceded the committee’s investigation was central to the party’s plans to maintain the majority in the November midterms.

“Jan. 6 committee faces a thorny challenge,” read a March 2022 headline from the Washington Post: “Persuading the public to care.” The article continued, “They hope their recommendations to prevent another insurrection will be adopted, but also that their work will repel voters from Republicans who they say helped propel the attack.”

The Soviet-style committee eventually became the legacy project for ousted Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney, who served as vice chair of the panel. By August, Cheney’s futile bid for re-election among one of the nation’s most conservative electorates was characterized as a “Kamikaze Campaign” by New York Magazine. Cheney overwhelmingly lost her effort for a fourth term and published a memoir last December. In the book, Cheney reflected on the committee’s hiring of Goldston to dramatize the hearings to boost Democrats’ electoral prospects.

“He came on board and brought with him a number of individuals with years of experience in network news,” Cheney wrote. “Goldston and his team were exceptionally helpful in facilitating that type of presentation. And our outline for each hearing — which took the form of a trial presentation — closely paralleled that structure.”

https://thefederalist.com/2024/02/01/j6-committee-admits-its-show-trials-were-an-election-year-publicity-stunt/ 


Oh how it was swallowed up by the "Must See TV" crowd. Biscuits meet gravy.

The irony

?si=ZXGleZY_SljCu6iX


The iron...eee

DrMaddVibe wrote:



Have watched it yet? 2 hours and 24 minutes.

Use to love Frontline. Then the6 went from Lean Left to so fare left they were spinning in circles.
DrMaddVibe
2 years ago

Have watched it yet? 2 hours and 24 minutes.

Use to love Frontline. Then the6 went from Lean Left to so fare left they were spinning in circles.

8trackdisco wrote:



What Tucker Carlson showed was the unvarnished video. Capitol Hill policemen opening doors, removing barricades and unlocking windows. Providing guided tours throughout the entire Capitol was a bit of a surprise, but hey when the FBI asks...you deliver and Ray Epps and Co. had a picture to deliver of total anarchy when in reality it was all a DNC psyops.

Did you swallow what they sold?

The truth was there. Posted all up here too.
Abrignac
2 years ago
The article headline “J6 Committee Admits Its Show Trials Were An Election-Year Publicity Stunt” is yet another example of a non-sequitur argument put forth by a highly partisan outlet.

Not saying it’s not a true statement, but by saying the committee did something the author implies that a consensus existed between at least a majority of the members. However, the article only quotes one member of the committee. Since when does one member not authorized to speak on behalf of an entire committee become the voice of that committee? The article goes on to say key members, but never names any of them nor does it provide quotes from any other member.

Again not saying something did or did not happen, just pointing out that when one relies on HIGHLY partisan outlets for his information he can easily be misled. The simpler the mind, the easier it’s misled.
DrMaddVibe
2 years ago
That's why I ALWAYS post the links to what I'm saying.

If you would've taken the time out of washing your ass you'd see that there are hyper links. These links go to other articles that CLEARLY state the freaking obvious you choose to ignore.

?si=mIM7i9Xfkm9rPIAy


Reading and even listening/watching a video is simply too hard for some.
Abrignac
2 years ago

That's why I ALWAYS post the links to what I'm saying.

If you would've taken the time out of washing your ass you'd see that there are hyper links. These links go to other articles that CLEARLY state the freaking obvious you choose to ignore.

?si=mIM7i9Xfkm9rPIAy


Reading and even listening/watching a video is simply too hard for some.

DrMaddVibe wrote:



Since seemingly ever article you post is from some far-right leaning source it’s safe to assume for every gram of fact in said article you post there will be a corresponding ton of opinion. So why would the videos be any different. Personally I’d rather watch 2 dogs fuck than waste 2 hours and 38 minutes watching a show produced by a partisan hack.

On the other hand, why post someone else’s work? Is it because you’re so simple-minded you’re incapable of formulating your own thoughts into anything meaningful?

A more effective post would have been “According to the sources 1, 2 and 3 Reps A, B, C who were members of the Jan 6 Select Committee etc stated that the reason for x was z.” Short, sweet, fact based and to the point. Including accessible links to your sources not links to the drivel you cut and pasted would make your posts much more effective. Instead you simply posted another example of Henny Penny running around in circles screaming that the sky is falling when it clearly is not.

But, I’m not surprised. You’re nothing but the one-trick-pony who absolutely abhors anything that doesn’t nicely fit into a finely defined place in your narrative. You hate half of the population of the US because they disagree with your myopic views. So when you’re not busy posting about the DNC being a terrorist organization or posting some opinion article usually with a catchy title but whose body lacks any facts to back up the ascertains made in the article’s title you post about how something that you have absolutely knowledge of needs to be changed.

If you weren’t the one I’m speaking of you’d probably agree that you are in fact the village idiot.
DrMaddVibe
2 years ago

Since seemingly ever article you post is from some far-right leaning source it’s safe to assume for every gram of fact in said article you post there will be a corresponding ton of opinion. So why would the videos be any different. Personally I’d rather watch 2 dogs fuck than waste 2 hours and 38 minutes watching a show produced by a partisan hack.

On the other hand, why post someone else’s work? Is it because you’re so simple-minded you’re incapable of formulating your own thoughts into anything meaningful?

A more effective post would have been “According to the sources 1, 2 and 3 Reps A, B, C who were members of the Jan 6 Select Committee etc stated that the reason for x was z.” Short, sweet, fact based and to the point. Including accessible links to your sources not links to the drivel you cut and pasted would make your posts much more effective. Instead you simply posted another example of Henny Penny running around in circles screaming that the sky is falling when it clearly is not.

But, I’m not surprised. You’re nothing but the one-trick-pony who absolutely abhors anything that doesn’t nicely fit into a finely defined place in your narrative. You hate half of the population of the US because they disagree with your myopic views. So when you’re not busy posting about the DNC being a terrorist organization or posting some opinion article usually with a catchy title but whose body lacks any facts to back up the ascertains made in the article’s title you post about how something that you have absolutely knowledge of needs to be changed.

If you weren’t the one I’m speaking of you’d probably agree that you are in fact the village idiot.

Abrignac wrote:



I don't agree at all with you and you're not intelligent. At all.
Mr. Jones
2 years ago
DrafterX owns 50 Hawaiian shirts...
He is a secret "PROUD BOY" SUBVERSIVE HURTIN UNIT...
RayR
2 years ago

I don't agree at all with you and you're not intelligent. At all.

DrMaddVibe wrote:



Hey MAN! Welcome to the "one-trick-pony" club! 😂
And don't ever compliment Abrignac, he's an ingrate.
Abrignac
2 years ago

I don't agree at all with you and you're not intelligent. At all.

DrMaddVibe wrote:



Idiots usually don’t understand logic. So I see why you feel that way.
Brewha
2 years ago

Since seemingly ever article you post is from some far-right leaning source it’s safe to assume for every gram of fact in said article you post there will be a corresponding ton of opinion. So why would the videos be any different. Personally I’d rather watch 2 dogs fuck than waste 2 hours and 38 minutes watching a show produced by a partisan hack.

On the other hand, why post someone else’s work? Is it because you’re so simple-minded you’re incapable of formulating your own thoughts into anything meaningful?

A more effective post would have been “According to the sources 1, 2 and 3 Reps A, B, C who were members of the Jan 6 Select Committee etc stated that the reason for x was z.” Short, sweet, fact based and to the point. Including accessible links to your sources not links to the drivel you cut and pasted would make your posts much more effective. Instead you simply posted another example of Henny Penny running around in circles screaming that the sky is falling when it clearly is not.

But, I’m not surprised. You’re nothing but the one-trick-pony who absolutely abhors anything that doesn’t nicely fit into a finely defined place in your narrative. You hate half of the population of the US because they disagree with your myopic views. So when you’re not busy posting about the DNC being a terrorist organization or posting some opinion article usually with a catchy title but whose body lacks any facts to back up the ascertains made in the article’s title you post about how something that you have absolutely knowledge of needs to be changed.

If you weren’t the one I’m speaking of you’d probably agree that you are in fact the village idiot.

Abrignac wrote:





Uh, Anthony….we all have been trying not to say that to his face……. 🤦
RobertHively
2 years ago

"Yes, these guys are so ridiculous, you post someone else's thoughts, then they accuse you of not having any original thoughts of your own. If you post only your own thoughts, they want links to someone else's thoughts to support your thoughts. I think they'd only be happy if we didn't have any thoughts at all."

-RayRay The Wise
Brewha
2 years ago



-RayRay The Wise

RobertHively wrote:



Plainly, this is the lowest bar for wisdom I have ever seem…..
DrMaddVibe
2 years ago

Uh, Anthony….we all have been trying not to say that to his face……. 🤦

Brewha wrote:



Sniveling coward. I'm the same in person as appear here. I Lmao at you and the crap you push. Maybe you can meet up at a truck stop glory hole and shower.


I've explained myself time and time again as to why I post what I post. As for the sources, the infamous truck stop bathroom groupie didn't care to me tion the articles I post from CNN, MSnbc, NY post, wash post and whatever site that contains information I choose to share. Why? Because he's stupid like you. You sop up whatever the government pitches you to do and you're 1st in line. Cheerleading and telling us to take useless shots, provide vaccine passports, buy an ev...doesn't matter. Useful tool. He's a bit different than you. He questions some but hates opposing sites and viewpoints that destroy the narratives he believes in.

Don't like it tough. What you can't do is find the lies. I do a pretty good job of not pushin them and setting what you push down the drain where it belongs. So please, you 2 knuckleheads keep on being yourselves and show the board who and what you really are.
DrMaddVibe
2 years ago

Plainly, this is the lowest bar for wisdom I have ever seem…..

Brewha wrote:




Your constant dismissal has me questioning how little you read and comprehend. It appears you lack the ability to look at an opposing viewpoint and see perhaps where you could learn.

To this date...you have posted nothing of value.

Nothing.

If you have to denigrate a poster for what he posts, prove him wrong with an articulate viewpont. If you have links to articles that back up what you need do that. If you can't do that be prepared to be tossed out with the chum.

You could be politically opposed to what he says but...if you're looking to share your pov...and provide nothing...STFU. He's doing it with panache and you're not even allowed at the kiddie table with your crayons.
RayR
2 years ago
If Brewha didn't have dismal, denigrating posts, he'd have no thoughts at all. 😉
8trackdisco
2 years ago
And there you have it. A microcosm of our society.

As long as there is such a large segment of Always Trumpers and Never Trumpers, the Dems will continue to dunk on the Reps.

Congrats, Brewha. You’ve got scoreboard and will probably continue that way until the Trump Trance is broken.

I don’t like it, but it is the state of things.
HockeyDad
2 years ago

And there you have it. A microcosm of our society.

As long as there is such a large segment of Always Trumpers and Never Trumpers, the Dems will continue to dunk on the Reps.

Congrats, Brewha. You’ve got scoreboard and will probably continue that way until the Trump Trance is broken.

I don’t like it, but it is the state of things.

8trackdisco wrote:




So basically the Democrats win unless the Republicans capitulate. This is why I bet on the Democratic Socialists winning.

Perhaps the Republicans should run Mitch McConnell for president.
Users browsing this topic