I never said they were the same as child molesters. Reread what I said.

I do think the Christian right agenda infringes on my rights. I've spelled that out. Not sure how to be more clear about it.

They are dangerous because they want to put their religious values into law, which is a form of religious fascism in my view.

John

Their "agenda" can not possibly infringe upon your rights.
It's their agenda, not yours.
It doesn't affect you in the least.

Don't be paranoid simply because you disagree with them.

John,
You can re-read your posts and correct me if I'm wrong, but here's what I gather from what you've stated:

1. You support the right of NAMBLA (child molestors) to exist as an organized entity based on "freedom of speech".

2. You strongly oppose the Relgious Right from using freedom of speech to make known their beliefs and values.

That is what you have stated.

yes to #1. not happy about it, but it's the price of freedom.

no to #2. i'd never oppose the right of a group to speak. i just hope to god (ironic, yes) that they are unsuccessful in their agenda.

It must suck to think that when you die, you die. It must suck to think there isn’t a God who loves you. I must suck to think the world is a better place without God.

It must suck to be faithless…

Verily, it sucketh.