they spent too much time attacking dean and not enough attacking bushy. they are all so desperate to be nominated, they are attacking the one man who might have the intellect and balls to beat w.

i still wonder if there will be a debate between bush and the democratic nominee without all the preconditions i mentioned on another post.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3873940/ 

Rick,

The only reason Dean has such a sizable lead is because nobody attacked him EARLIER.

They all saw his numbers rise surprisingly fast early on because he was the first one to attack Bush on All Things, including the war.

They then proceeded to do a liberal circle jerk around him (Dean) and claim they too were against the war.

Then they had to watch as his numbers continued to grow due to good foresight and the strongest internet presence.

Only now are they realizing they need to beat Dean before they can beat President Bush.

But now it's too late.

And Dean's "Anti-Everything" campaign will run its course.

The ONLY "hope" a democrat has is a drop in the economy.

Quite a sad situation for anyone who leans left. They really do have to hope for bad things in order to get their candidate into office.

How utterly pathetic.

tailgater

i do not wish for the economy to get worse,

i do not wish for another soldier to get killed in iraq, defending the rabble.

i wish for a dean presidency and a return to morality and no longer a corporate run government, run by an immoral, lying, dishonest and self serving administration.

i have heard dean speak whenever i can and i do not find him anti-everything. i find him anti-bush, and strangely i find that refreshing.