EI
  • EI
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
Friday, March 4, 2005 6:21:00 AM
By Susan Jones

CNSNews.com Morning Editor

March 02, 2005

(CNSNews.com) - The president of the Springfield, Ill., chapter of the

Million Mom March faces charges of having drugs and an illegal handgun in

her home. Press reports said the gun's serial number had been scratched off.

Annette Stevens became a gun control activist after her son was shot to

death several years ago. She told a newspaper the gun belonged to her late

son, and when she found it, she didn't know what to do with it, so she put

it in a drawer.

Police reportedly found the gun and illegal drugs while executing a search

warrant at Stevens' home in connection with a spate of drive-by shootings in

the area. Stevens insists the search was illegal.

Second Amendment groups were quick to note the irony of a gun control

activist being arrested on gun charges.

The Illinois State Rifle Association (ISRA) called it a classic case of

"liberal elitists" who "cannot walk their own talk."

"I find it incredible that someone representing an organization that pushes

legislation that only punishes law-abiding gun owners would possess such an

illegal weapon," said Richard Pearson, ISRA's executive director.

"Surely she must be familiar with US gun laws and those in Illinois,

considering the position she holds. Does she think the law does not apply to

her due to anti-gun affiliation? It's the height of hypocrisy!"

Press reports said Stevens did not have the ID card required of Illinois

firearms owners.

The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms called it ironic

that "this poster mom for gun control" has admitted keeping an illegally

altered handgun in her home while she's campaigned to deprive other citizens

of their firearms.

"If Stevens is so convinced guns don't belong in society, then why didn't

she immediately turn that gun over to the police when she found it more than

two years ago?" asked CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb.

"Why did she keep it? What's wrong with this picture? Ms. Stevens is about

to learn that supporting gun control is like keeping a vicious dog. They

sometimes bite the hands that feed them."

"In the kind of Draconian anti-gun society Stevens and her cohorts are

trying to create," Gottlieb continued, "it wouldn't matter if she were

innocent as she claims. Under the laws her group supports, gun owners are

essentially considered guilty until they prove themselves otherwise."

CCRKBA said gun laws supported by activists such as Stevens do nothing to

prevent crime - but go a long way in eroding the rights of law-abiding

citizens.

lukin
Friday, March 4, 2005 6:34:00 AM
I don't own a gun, probably never will. But I can't stand the gun control people...serves em right. Reminds me of Rosie O' Donnel, or Michael Moore, both gun control activists, both can afford bodygaurds to carry their guns (and in Moore's case illegally) for them.
bloody spaniard
Friday, March 4, 2005 9:52:00 AM
^ Well said.

BTW, your "feel good" story made me giddy, EI. Thanks!

Maybe she'll get some hard time.

After all, that what's she's fighting for- isn' it?

LOL

MACS
Friday, March 4, 2005 5:54:00 PM
We studious types like to call this "poetic justice".

Well... THE studious types... of which I probably am NOT.

adroomi
Saturday, March 5, 2005 5:02:00 PM
Since when is Michael Moore a gun control activist?

Funny, I thought he was a lifelong member of the NRA, avid deer hunter, and pretty darn good skeet shooter as well.

Hum, maybe I'm wrong. I mean he did after all make a movie about the socio-economic problems in America that cause us to kill each other in record numbers, and he dared to question why we don't do something to try and stop the violence. Therefore, I can see why he would be labled as such. I mean, anyone who doesn't like killing is obviously an advocate of gun control right?

MACS
Monday, March 7, 2005 11:00:00 AM
Sorry for the late reply... but I believe the reasons 'we' kill each other are not socio-economic, so much as they are a lack of morals.

It has nothing to do with economics and everything to do with a persons sense of what is right and wrong.

If I was dirt friggin' poor and living on the street, it wouldn't cause me to kill somebody.

Lots of homeless folks in San Diego would agree with me, i'm sure...

bloody spaniard
Monday, March 7, 2005 11:10:00 AM
^Just look at our own 1930's.

Poverty was widespread during the Depression & yet serious crime was relatively low.

People had more of a moral compass.

usahog
Monday, March 7, 2005 11:48:00 AM
Back to this thread.... Keith (Rookie139) sent me this one in an email since my hometown paper was the one with the article...

beleive it or not.. the Mrs. and I spent Sunday morning/afternoon's (11:00-2:30pm) church in a black community church...the pastor and church had an evangilist preacher from another large town come in...

during her services she mentioned this and asked for prayers to go out for this woman and her family... She also mentioned the staying strong and I felt was mixing Politics with Religion in her sermon... she talked about the fight the NAACP has ongoing and praise out to them...

I enjoyed the rest of the sermon and the contact with the many heartfelt warm welcomes throughout the services and even afterwards... and the wife and I are going to be attending the Revival that runs through this week... But I cannot get the feelings brushed away of the political mix with the religion issue off my mind??? I don't like this happening even to the smallest amount... Church is a fellowship with God.. not a place to discuss or intermix political agendas etc...I will know by the weeks out whether it is me and my guard shot up because of these first impressions or if this church is another one of those that condones using the words of god for an agenda away from scripture it is ment for...

Hog