RICKAMAVEN
Friday, March 18, 2005 6:10:00 AM
SLOWLY

Lawmaker Seeks to End Sexy Cheerleading

By APRIL CASTRO

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) - The Friday night lights in Texas could soon be without bumpin' and grindin' cheerleaders. Legislation filed by Rep. Al Edwards would put an end to ``sexually suggestive'performances at athletic events and other extracurricular competitions.

``It's just too sexually oriented, you know, the way they're shaking their behinds and going on, breaking it down,' said Edwards, a 26-year veteran of the Texas House. ``And then we say to them, 'don't get involved in sex unless it's marriage or love, it's dangerous out there' and yet the teachers and directors are helping them go through those kind of gyrations.'

Under Edwards' bill, if a school district knowingly permits such a performance, funds from the state would be reduced in an amount to be determined by the education commissioner.

Edwards said he filed the bill as a result of several instances of seeing such ribald performances in his district.

J.M. Farias, owner of Austin Cheer Factory, said cheerleading aficionados would welcome the law. Cheering competitions, he said, penalize for suggestive movements or any vulgarity.

``Any coaches that are good won't put that in their routines,' he said. And, most girls cheering on Friday nights were trained by professionals who know better, he said.

``I don't think this law would really shake the industry at all. In fact, it would give parents a better feeling, mostly dads and boyfriends, too,' Farias said.

Although cheerleaders must meet the same no-pass, no-play academic requirements of athletes, cheerleading is not a competition sanctioned by the University Interscholastic League, the governing body of Texas high school sports.

The UIL also does not have performance regulations for squads who cheer for their teams at state championships, said Athletic Coordinator Peter Contreras.

``I think it should have been cut out a long time ago,' Edwards said. ``It surely needs to be toned down.'

i think he is softy watching the girls gyrate.

andytv
Friday, March 18, 2005 7:44:00 AM
I hate anti-cheerleading laws.

BUT..... a beautiful young lady who is confident and a talented dancer does not need to be overtly vulgar to be sexually appealing.

RICKAMAVEN
Friday, March 18, 2005 1:34:00 PM
sometimes it helps.
usahog
Friday, March 18, 2005 1:55:00 PM
So what have they decided to do for the Veterans???

Hog

RICKAMAVEN
Friday, March 18, 2005 7:19:00 PM
usahog

see

http://www.cigarbid.com/auction/forum/forum.cfm?action 

=list&forumID=7&messageDisplay=0000000035493

first things first.

EI
  • EI
  • Herf-A-Holic
Sunday, March 20, 2005 4:43:00 AM
Why do you think the article forgot to mention he was a black democrat?

Could it be that they feel only white republicans can have zealous feelings about sex and decency

adroomi
Sunday, March 20, 2005 4:54:00 AM
Maybe they didn't feel that his skin color made a difference.................?
EI
  • EI
  • Herf-A-Holic
Sunday, March 20, 2005 5:14:00 AM
nor his party affilation?

If he was a republican I am sure it would have been mention

And that was my point

Which you missed and spun to your own liking

snowwolf777
Sunday, March 20, 2005 5:15:00 AM
No, he's half right. If it's a Democrat suggesting something, his party affiliation doesn't show up in the story because "what's that got to do with it?" If a Republican suggested this piece of stupidity, it would have been in the lead paragraph.
snowwolf777
Sunday, March 20, 2005 5:16:00 AM
Sorry EI, you beat me to the punch on your defense.
EI
  • EI
  • Herf-A-Holic
Sunday, March 20, 2005 5:27:00 AM
your right snow. if he had been a republican the headline would have been

"REPUBLICAN Lawmaker Seeks to End Sexy Cheerleading"

adroomi
Sunday, March 20, 2005 5:47:00 AM
I've got a good idea....this is if you want some seriously unbiased news.

Quit watching the news in America, and quit reading US news publications. They are in fact biased. I do agree with that.

Subscribe to some other TV channels and newspapers from abroad. Not only will you get unbiased news about America....but also the rest of the world.

BBC is well worth watching.

RICKAMAVEN
Sunday, March 20, 2005 2:11:00 PM
EI

i did not know his party affiliation or his skin color.

i'll be sure to look for that in the future.

i know it will make a big difference in how i feel about what someone says.

EI
  • EI
  • Herf-A-Holic
Sunday, March 20, 2005 2:41:00 PM
"i know it will make a big difference in how i feel about what someone says."

It always has in the past

snowwolf777
Sunday, March 20, 2005 2:45:00 PM
I get BBC. I like the depth of coverage. I wouldn't call it unbiased by any means, but certainly more/different coverage than you get from Katie, Matt and Al. There was some fantastic coverage of the tsunami that I didn't see anywhere else.