usahog
  • usahog
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
Thursday, April 7, 2005 7:16:00 AM
http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050406-064952-1703r.htm 

Judge eases anthrax vaccine order

Washington, DC, Apr. 6 (UPI) -- A federal judge in Washington Wednesday ruled the military can administer anthrax vaccine on a voluntary basis to service members under certain conditions.

In October, U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan issued an order permanently barring the Pentagon's anthrax vaccine program. He ruled the vaccine had not been classified by the Food and Drug Administration as safe and effective for that use -- unless the president waived that requirement for the vaccine.

The Pentagon filed a new motion insisting there were other conditions under which the program could proceed, and the judge agreed, modifying his earlier order.

"Congress appears to have authorized the use of (FDA) unapproved drugs ... based upon a declaration of (military) emergency" from the Health and Human Services and Defense departments, Sullivan said.

The judge said the Defense Department may administer the vaccine on a voluntary basis following a lawful emergency use authorization.

Sullivan said his ruling "makes no finding as to the lawfulness of any specific (emergency use authorization) that has been or may be approved by the Department of Health and Human Services."

usahog
  • usahog
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
Thursday, April 7, 2005 7:21:00 AM
Judge Lets U.S. Troops Get Voluntary Anthrax Shots

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=8107484 

Wed Apr 6, 2005 07:00 PM ET

By Will Dunham

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A federal judge on Wednesday permitted the Defense Department to begin giving troops anthrax vaccinations on a voluntary basis after ordering a halt last October to mandatory shots.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan granted the Bush administration's request to modify last fall's injunction to allow for voluntary inoculations under a 2004 law bolstering the government's ability to protect against bioterrorism.

Sullivan on Oct. 27 forbade the Pentagon from giving the anthrax shots to military personnel, stating that the Food and Drug Administration had acted improperly when it allowed the experimental shots for general use. The Pentagon had given the shots to 1.2 million troops since 1998.

Anthrax spores can be used in germ warfare to give victims the deadly bacterial disease.

Lt. Col. Chris Conway, a Pentagon spokesman, called the anthrax vaccine "an important force protection measure," but said the vaccines will not be offered until the department completes detailed rules "in the near future." Conway was not more specific on the timetable.

Sullivan's action came in a lawsuit filed by six unnamed military personnel and civilian workers who objected to the vaccinations. A relatively small number of U.S. troops have refused to get the Pentagon's mandatory anthrax and smallpox shots due to worries about side effects, and some have been thrown out of the military.

In his order, Sullivan wrote that with the 2004 law "Congress appears to have authorized the use of unapproved drugs or the unapproved use of approved drugs based on a declaration of emergency by the secretary of health and human services."

Sullivan wrote that the law said such a declaration would be based on a determination by the defense secretary of the existence of or potential for a military emergency in which U.S. forces faced the threat of attack with chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear weapons.

The Pentagon had mandated that many troops deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan get the anthrax shot, and widened its anthrax vaccinations last summer to include personnel in South Korea.

Pentagon officials have insisted the shots are safe and effective.

But the lawsuit contended that the drug was never shown to protect against the form of anthrax in which airborne bacterial spores are inhaled into the lungs -- the most likely way troops would face the disease on a battlefield.

Sullivan ruled in 2003 the FDA had never approved the vaccine and issued an order halting Pentagon vaccinations. The next week, the FDA approved the vaccine, and the shots were resumed only to be halted again last October.

usahog
  • usahog
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
Thursday, April 7, 2005 7:32:00 AM
NOTICE:

In accordance with the Court’s order of April 5, 2005, defendants hereby report that the Food and Drug Administration has approved the following language, which has been added to the tri-fold brochure to be provided to potential recipients of anthrax vaccine adsorbed pursuant to the emergency use authorization of January 27, 2005:

“On October 27, 2004, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued an Order declaring unlawful and prohibiting mandatory anthrax vaccinations to protect against inhalation anthrax, pending further FDA action.

The Court’s injunction means you have the right to refuse to take the vaccine without fear of retaliation. A copy of the Court’s Order and Opinion is available at www.anthrax.mil or from the vaccination clinic.”

Dated: April 6, 2005

Respectfully submitted,

PETER D. KEISLER

Assistant Attorney General

KENNETH L. WAINSTEIN

United States Attorney

VINCENT M. GARVEY

Deputy Branch Director

_______________________________________________________

I wish CBid had the option to BOLD..

Very Important HERE:

"The Court’s injunction means you have the right to refuse to take the vaccine without fear of retaliation."

Hog

usahog
  • usahog
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
Thursday, April 7, 2005 10:11:00 AM
What the recent court order means in short, is that the program is "voluntary", and that members may not be coerced into taking the anthrax vaccine, or punished for refusing it, as long as the program remains in a voluntary status. IF a service member is either being coerced, threatened into taking the vaccine, or punished for refusing to do so, as long as the voluntary status is in place, contact attorney Mark Zaid @ [email protected]

Hog