RICKAMAVEN
Thursday, May 19, 2005 4:56:00 AM
RDC
  • RDC
  • Herf-A-Holic
Thursday, May 19, 2005 8:21:00 AM
Hmmm, a chimp that is into rockets. Cool
adroomi
Thursday, May 19, 2005 8:42:00 AM
I can't stop laughing at this photo. Regardless of the message or whether I'm for or against, that is one funny photo.....
RDC
  • RDC
  • Herf-A-Holic
Thursday, May 19, 2005 8:43:00 AM
Rick fell off the wagon
cycledreamn
Thursday, May 19, 2005 9:19:00 AM
Ya, but it is a funny picture.
PMoreno349
Thursday, May 19, 2005 11:31:00 AM
🙂

zapgr
Thursday, May 19, 2005 12:33:00 PM
funny and scary at the same time

zapgr
Thursday, May 19, 2005 12:33:00 PM
funny and scary at the same time

Charlie
Thursday, May 19, 2005 1:21:00 PM
Just remember:

"It is a hard job"!

Charlie

LJCHAD
Thursday, May 19, 2005 2:07:00 PM
Curious George
sli38
Thursday, May 19, 2005 3:12:00 PM
Rick,

Don't you ever get tired of the political stuff. Why don't you join a political forum.

Homebrew
Thursday, May 19, 2005 6:09:00 PM
ROTFLMFAO

Great Post rick.

Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)

RICKAMAVEN
Thursday, May 19, 2005 9:59:00 PM
sli38

when you saw the picture, did you think this post was about cigars.

TrannyMk
Thursday, May 19, 2005 10:20:00 PM
Rick you are getting desperate... just like Harry Reid is... I love it!!!!!!!!!

GO CONSTITUTIONAL OPTION!!!!... or as the losers would say... the nuke option, hehe!...

Homebrew
Friday, May 20, 2005 4:20:00 AM
Hey TrannyMK,

I think removing the filibuster is a boneheaded move, that tilts the balance of power, in a misguided way, for short term benefits, which do not warrant the changing of 200 years of parlamentary tradition. It will come back to bite the republicans in the Ass.

Later

Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)

Krubs
Friday, May 20, 2005 5:17:00 AM
The 200 years of Senate tradition was shattered when the Dems started to filibuster judicial appointments when Bush was elected. It had only been done once before in American Senate history, and that was in 1964 (I think), when there was a very short bipartisan filibuster (or threat of one) on President Johnsons's appointment of Abe Fortas. Other than that, all Presidential judicial appointments have been allowed an up or down vote.
TrannyMk
Friday, May 20, 2005 9:02:00 AM
Krubs, good post.

Homebrew, you better do your homework guy. Like Krubs said, a filibuster hasnt been done before to this type of judges. The Dems like Reid thought filibusters were OK just a few years ago. What made them change their minds?

I'll tell you why. When you lose the majority in the house, the senate and the White House, desperation sets in.

If it was wrong or illegal it wouldnt be allowed at all! It's there because it is a legal option.

I cant wait to see the sh*t hit the fan!!! Poor Demmies, hehe!

pmn1
Friday, May 20, 2005 9:04:00 AM
So True!
TrannyMk
Friday, May 20, 2005 9:05:00 AM
I meant 'filibuster were not OK', not 'were OK'... sorry...
rugrunner
Saturday, May 21, 2005 1:17:00 PM
I really like it when Harry says that taking away the filbuster is wrong becouse it keeps the minority from getting it's way. I thought that was the point of the whole majority/minority thing. Majority rules.