Any comments on the recent changes? Pretty much way cool in my eyes. Are there other sites similar that have such a wealth of informative ratings data? I'm a little suprised that some very good cigars are getting what I'd consider to be lesser ratings and visa versa. Maybe data will smooth out with more review data or maybe it is THE TRUTH. Who knows/Who cares/Smoke on.

lone wolf one of the best with low ratings, Elvis told me. Thank you thank you very much. JonR

a good database of reviews. well worth looking at as a reference. very extensive, and believable

fgruben-thx for the reference. jonR-u sure about the lone wuf? alot posters dis lone wuf as a dog rocket -- what other cigars do you smoke?

Lone Wolf is only good for mulch around your holly bushes. Makes em pointier.

Yo busdaddy just joking I rate lone wolf on a scale from 1 to 10 a -462 they suck. I smoke full body cigars like Partagas, CAO, Indian Tab, Perdomo, Onyx, Padron, Excalibur, Monticristo, Pinar Series B., to name a few and I lean toward Maduro wrapper. JonR

Thanks, fg. I agree with your opinion.

I've been an avid user of cigaraficianado.com for ratings and info, plus check out the women of cigar aficianado!!! As far as smokemag.com is concerned, I think it sucks!! I just purchased my first copy of smoke while waiting for a plane and holy sh*t does that mag suck. It has 1/10th the wit, intelligence and usefulness of CA!! And to top it off their reviews are worthless, CA's reviews are by trained seasoned veterans in the cigar world, whereas smoke does a panel of people who I'm surprised knew how to light the correct end of the stogie. I'm in a pissy mood so I'll shut up and get some sleep...