I agree with that. I don't feel he even deserves the few feet of room he has now.
One thing that is interesting in that article however is this:
"However, last July, when the Iraqi provisional government took over, the British government took the decision it would be illegal to allow their interrogators to question the detainees."
That's sort of interesting. Why is it that "we" are holding him? Shouldn't he be handed over to his own people? If the Brits are saying this is illegal, does that mean we are doing something illegal?
Just wondering, it's something I want to check out now that my curiousity is sparked.
