http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11927856/ 

Naji Sabri, Iraq’s foreign minister under Saddam:

"On the issue of chemical weapons, the CIA said Saddam had stockpiled as much as "500 metric tons of chemical warfare agents" and had "renewed" production of deadly agents. Sabri said Iraq had stockpiled weapons and had "poison gas" left over from the first Gulf War. Both Sabri and the agency were wrong."

We paid him, a double-agent large sums of money to tell us the truth. He did.

Now Fox and the Ruskies tell me that there were WMD's there.

Who should I believe?

does it matter? our prez has declared "mission accomplished".

Tey, Again I ask You.. What was the Mission?

you jump onto another thread and say the same thing.. but do you know what that Mission Was?

Hog

Of course he doesn't. His opposition and derision towards the current administration are purely reflexive. No information or thought was required.

The initial mission was accomplished. Saddam and the Bathist out of power.Gone. Now we face new missions.

usahog

if i may be so bold.

one of the reasons was to control iraq's oil, get iraq into opec and insure a limited supply of oil and a dramatic increase in the price at the pump.

that wasn't george's reason, because george has no ability to reason. it was the whole point in getting him elected. that is why plans were made to invade iraq were started as soon as he got sworn in.

9/11 was a fortuitous event for the planners of the invasion of and as we see now the destabilization iraq.

"mission accomplished" was a photo opp not worthy of discussion.

I agree, Rick

It is a trick question. How can you say what the mission was when it was never stated as such. Also, one may mean what was the "real" mission. And so on.

I think it is all about Israeli control of the American political system and Arab oil and land.

But I know this is an oversimplification.

There are many factions that have a stake.

You can't leave out the Russians and the Chinese from just about any world politics.

Many people forget that oil corporations also had much to gain. In the short run, the most thus far.

But long term motives point to Israel.

They have the most to gain in both natural resources and strategic positioning.

They are now strategically positioned to control our government and, very soon, the arab peninsula.

That mission is still ongoing, though.

JEEEEEZSHH! I give up!

tey

have you ever served in the Military? I seriously doubt it, but await your response.

Charlie

Wjm, maybe if you put this in the form of a poem or limerick tey could understand it and you'd get attaboys from the peanut gallery.

**threadjack**

Rug, can you get to your email?

What the hell does it matter if tey served in the military?

I think it matters.

Not sure if my thinking it matters, matters.

TJ- yup

I'm not sure it matters either Erik.

Could job flaunting that winning personality again Rug. Personal attacks is really all your party has a hold on.

"What the hell does it matter if tey served in the military?"

Yea Charlie, what does it matter if Tey served in the Military or not? Clinton never did and the world got to see what his 8 yrs of control over the Military got the USA...

Let these Armchair Generals Speak.. I like to hear/read their version of how they'd handle the situation in Iraq and this War on Terror.. gives me something to LMAO about!!

Hog

LMAO at Bush's handling of the war on terror. O yeah....he really wasn't in the military either.

That's right - as we've all seen, Democrats in general and Tey in particular eschew personal attacks and are positively overflowing with brilliant ideas. Why else do you think they control the executive and legislative branches of our government?

control what? have you seen the majority lately??