fishinguitarman
15 years ago
HANOVER, N.H. – Republicans looking to unseat President Barack Obama charged that he undermined the sensitive and delicate negotiations for Middle East peace with his outline for resumed talks between Israelis and Palestinians.

Former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman said Obama, whom he served as U.S. ambassador to China until last month, undercut an opportunity for Israelis and Palestinians to build trust. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney said Obama "threw Israel under the bus" and handed the Palestinians a victory even before negotiations between the parties could resume. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich called it "the most dangerous speech ever made by an American president for the survival of Israel."

Foreign policy has hardly been the center of the debate among the still-forming GOP presidential field. Instead, the candidates and potential candidates have kept their focus — like the country's — on domestic issues that are weighing on voters and their pocketbooks. Obama's speech Thursday provided one of the first opportunities for Republicans to assert their foreign policy differences with Obama and his Democratic administration.

Obama endorsed Palestinians' demands for the borders of its future state based on 1967 borders — before the Six Day War in which Israel occupied East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza. That was a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy.

Campaigning here in the state that hosts the first presidential nominating primary, Huntsman also said the United States should respect Israel and work to foster trust between Israelis and Palestinians.

[ For complete coverage of politics and policy, go to Yahoo! Politics ]


"If we respect and recognize Israel as the ally that it is, we probably ought to listen to what they think is best," said Huntsman, who served in the administrations of Presidents Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush before surprising his party and serving Obama, a Democrat.

He acknowledged he didn't watch Obama's speech and was reacting to news coverage — or, as he called it, "the aftermath."

"It is disrespectful of Israel for America to dictate negotiating terms to our ally," Romney said in an interview with The Associated Press. "It is not appropriate for the president to dictate the terms."

Instead, the United States should work with Israel to push for peace without acceding to the Palestinians, he said.

Gingrich said Israel simply cannot go back to the 1967 borders and expect to remain secure, given technological advancements that would allow its enemies to fire rockets deeper into the state.

"Get a map of the region and look at what Hamas does in firing missiles into Israel," Gingrich told The Associated Press. "The president should have said that Hamas has to abandon its determination to destroy Israel."

Obama urged Israel to accept that it can never have a truly peaceful nation based on "permanent occupation." That follows what other Republicans have painted as hostility from this administration toward a stalwart ally in the Middle East.

"The current administration needs to come to terms with its confused and dangerous foreign policy soon, as clarity and security are the necessary conditions of any serious and coherent American set of policies," Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania said in a statement.

Obama's speech at the State Department addressed the uprisings sweeping the Arab world. Speaking to audiences abroad and at home, he sought to leave no doubt that the U.S. stands behind the protesters who have swelled from nation to nation across the Middle East and North Africa.

"We know that our own future is bound to this region by the forces of economics and security; history and faith," the president said.

But the remarks only muddied things, especially on the dicey issue of Jerusalem, said former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty.

"The city of Jerusalem must never be re-divided," Pawlenty said. "At this time of upheaval in the Middle East, it's never been more important for America to stand strong for Israel and for a united Jerusalem."

Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, a tea party favorite who is leaning toward a run, called the border suggestions "a shocking display of betrayal" to Israel.

"Today President Barack Obama has again indicated that his policy towards Israel is to blame Israel first," she said in a statement.

On Twitter, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin didn't directly address the speech but urged Obama to publicly welcome Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu instead of ushering him into private meetings away from reporters, as has occurred on Netanyahu's previous visits. The two leaders will talk Friday at the White House.

"Dear Mr. President, please allow our ally, PM Netanyahu, to respectfully arrive through the front door this time. Thanks, Concerned Americans," she tweeted.

DrMaddVibe
15 years ago
Mittens = Owebama in whiteface.

Nothing to see there.

Move along.
chiefburg
15 years ago
I believe Israel now owns the land in dispute. The Palestinians attempted to invade and destroy Israel. Israel held off the attack and took the spoils of war. It's been their land since 1967. Too frickin' bad......if you don't want to lose land, don't attack your neighbor....
HockeyDad
15 years ago
If the goal all along has been that Israel is the land from the sea to the river and the USA backed that plan, then Obama threw Israel under the bus. If that was not the goal, Obama's speech was tame and only stated the obvious and Romney and Gingrich are just trying to automatically take some sort of opposition viewpoint for political gain.
HockeyDad
15 years ago

I believe Israel now owns the land in dispute. The Palestinians attempted to invade and destroy Israel. Israel held off the attack and took the spoils of war. It's been their land since 1967. Too frickin' bad......if you don't want to lose land, don't attack your neighbor....

chiefburg wrote:





War for land conquest ended with World War 2. Your logic would dictate that Iraq and Afghanistan and now permanent US possessions.

However, I can be convinced that the land is now Israel. In that case, Israel should officially annex it all and all residents of the West Bank and Gaza (formerly known as the Palestinian Territories) should now become full Israeli citizens with all rights and privileges.

Problem solved.
DrMaddVibe
15 years ago
Newtered is on a roll lately.

That jackwagon can't make up his mind on any issue and looks great in glitter.

Sorry, but if this is the best the GOP can roll out then its obvious that we've become a one party system.

Wake up America.

They're taking your rights one by one and we're sleeping.

Overthrow the Federal Reserve.

Cut the spending

Bring the Boys back home.

Stop the insanity.

RON PAUL 2012.
DrMaddVibe
15 years ago

However, I can be convinced that the land is now Israel. In that case, Israel should officially annex it all and all residents of the West Bank and Gaza (formerly known as the Palestinian Territories) should now become full Israeli citizens with all rights and privileges.

Problem solved.

HockeyDad wrote:



THAT is NOT going to happen.

You know it too.
HockeyDad
15 years ago
Well we can't maintain status quo for another 40 years!

Eliminate all US foreign aid to Israel until the concentration camps are dismantled.
DrMaddVibe
15 years ago
Giving money to other nations MUST stop.

Under conditions shouldn't even be an option.
DrafterX
15 years ago
will they still get cheese..??? 😕
fishinguitarman
15 years ago
Hillary Palin Pelosi 2012
daveincincy
15 years ago
If Obama can organize a community, surely he can bring nations together. He knows what he's doing.

...and don't call him Shirley.
Papachristou
15 years ago

Newtered is on a roll lately.

That jackwagon can't make up his mind on any issue and looks great in glitter.

Sorry, but if this is the best the GOP can roll out then its obvious that we've become a one party system.

Wake up America.

They're taking your rights one by one and we're sleeping.

Overthrow the Federal Reserve.

Cut the spending

Bring the Boys back home.

Stop the insanity.

RON PAUL 2012.

DrMaddVibe wrote:



yessir, i think youve nailed it, we are losing rights faster than i am losing my hair, dont get me started on the fed or soldiers, ron paul will not win i am sad to say. a vote to him is lost in the wind.
borndead1
15 years ago

I believe Israel now owns the land in dispute. The Palestinians attempted to invade and destroy Israel. Israel held off the attack and took the spoils of war. It's been their land since 1967. Too frickin' bad......if you don't want to lose land, don't attack your neighbor....

chiefburg wrote:




Umm...no. That's the story that has been told for the last 40 years, but no. Israel struck first, claiming they were in imminent danger of an attack from Egypt, which even our own intelligence said wouldn't likely happen and would have been futile on Egypt's part anyway.
HockeyDad
15 years ago



Sorry, but if this is the best the GOP can roll out then its obvious that we've become a one party system.

DrMaddVibe wrote:




On the topic of the Republican presidential candidates......

Game over.

Get under the Obama Cone of Protection
DrMaddVibe
15 years ago

On the topic of the Republican presidential candidates......

Game over.

Get under the Obama Cone of Protection

HockeyDad wrote:




No way.

I'd NEVER vote for someone with no experience. He's flying by the seat of his pants racing to the bottom.
HockeyDad
15 years ago
....but he's got like two years of experience now!
HockeyDad
15 years ago
HEY FUZZNJ>>>>>>

Notice I took Obama's side??

....and you call me a right wing hack.
DrMaddVibe
15 years ago

....but he's got like two years of experience now!

HockeyDad wrote:




and he's *****ed up everything he's done!

Yeah...WINNING...DUH!#-o
HockeyDad
15 years ago
Well he did parachute into Pakistan and kill Osama Bin Laden with his bare hands just like Chuck Norris would have done.
Users browsing this topic