I just spent 12 hours complying with Federal regulations and my eyes can no longer focus..

Victor is really Janet Nopolitano

Is the Readers Digest Condensed Version out yet?

For an abbreviated understanding, just read the synopsis and/or conclusions for each section...

He probably wants a synopsis of the synopsis.....

To summarize the entire article into one sentence:

Anyone who ever disagrees with victor809 in the cbid forum is 100% incorrect in every way.

You're just gonna have to read the article if you want to dispute that.

No they're not.

Prove it.

Page 4, paragraph 2 states that awesomeness and morality are the same.

The conclusion ties the two together and shows previous studies agree that disagreeing with victor leads to chronic incorrectness (and masturbation unfortunately).

My point being that unless you are going to read an article, one can't actually have an intelligent argument about it, and essentially has to accept anything written in it or even any conclusions made from the data.

It is a weak substitute for a Chick-Fil-A spicy chicken sammich!

But an equally relevant point is that in order for an article to be read, it first must contain an interesting topic, have nude pictures of babes, be introduced with such creativity as to build a level of interest, or have assorted exposed boobies.

Or go for a quick laugh from the crowd...riight?