jackconrad
13 years ago
Umm ..

I just spent 12 hours complying with Federal regulations and my eyes can no longer focus..
wheelrite
13 years ago

Umm ..

I just spent 12 hours complying with Federal regulations ad my eyes can no longer focus..

jackconrad wrote:



Victor is really Janet Nopolitano
CWFoster
13 years ago

https://www.dropbox.com/s/iq3axjogkuagn8a/Liu%20Ditto%2012%20What%20Dilemma%20SPPS.pdf

victor809 wrote:



Is the Readers Digest Condensed Version out yet?
rfenst
13 years ago

Is the Readers Digest Condensed Version out yet?

CWFoster wrote:



For an abbreviated understanding, just read the synopsis and/or conclusions for each section...
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago








EAT







MOR










CHIKIN'















=p~
victor809
13 years ago

For an abbreviated understanding, just read the synopsis and/or conclusions for each section...

rfenst wrote:



He probably wants a synopsis of the synopsis.....

To summarize the entire article into one sentence:

Anyone who ever disagrees with victor809 in the cbid forum is 100% incorrect in every way.

You're just gonna have to read the article if you want to dispute that.
jpotts
13 years ago

He probably wants a synopsis of the synopsis.....

To summarize the entire article into one sentence:

Anyone who ever disagrees with victor809 in the cbid forum is 100% incorrect in every way.

You're just gonna have to read the article if you want to dispute that.

victor809 wrote:



No they're not.
tailgater
13 years ago

He probably wants a synopsis of the synopsis.....

To summarize the entire article into one sentence:

Anyone who ever disagrees with victor809 in the cbid forum is 100% incorrect in every way.

victor809 wrote:



Prove it.
victor809
13 years ago
Page 3, paragraph 6 states that victor of the cbid forums is awesome.

Page 4, paragraph 2 states that awesomeness and morality are the same.

The conclusion ties the two together and shows previous studies agree that disagreeing with victor leads to chronic incorrectness (and masturbation unfortunately).

My point being that unless you are going to read an article, one can't actually have an intelligent argument about it, and essentially has to accept anything written in it or even any conclusions made from the data.
HockeyDad
13 years ago
Actually if someone doesn't read it, they don't need to accept anything written in it. Therefore it is written for a specific audience who needs some way to pat themselves on the back.

It is a weak substitute for a Chick-Fil-A spicy chicken sammich!
tailgater
13 years ago



My point being that unless you are going to read an article, one can't actually have an intelligent argument about it, and essentially has to accept anything written in it or even any conclusions made from the data.

victor809 wrote:




But an equally relevant point is that in order for an article to be read, it first must contain an interesting topic, have nude pictures of babes, be introduced with such creativity as to build a level of interest, or have assorted exposed boobies.


tailgater
13 years ago
And for the record, I would push Victor onto the trolley tracks if it was likely to save a small domesticated animal.


DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

And for the record, I would push Victor onto the trolley tracks if it was likely to save a small domesticated animal.


tailgater wrote:




Or go for a quick laugh from the crowd...riight?
Users browsing this topic