There has got to be a "conspiracy" here, right?
I don't think there is a conspiracy but do think the election factored in on timing.
He still is on the hook, if there is a hook.
^. This.
teedubbya wrote:
Good Morning America "woke up" two days after the election and postulated for the first time there could be some kind of cover-up in the Libya thingie.
But on a positive note, the video criminal mastermind behind the riot was caught and given an year in jail. Mission accomplished.
[sarcasm]
They can still ask him to testify, perhaps as a citizen he can be more candid.
Subpoena his bony "winning the will of the muslims with our tax money" ass. [ram27bat]
bloody spaniard wrote:
Yep.....make him talk.....even if he is a "hostile witness".
Who cares?
rfenst wrote:
Agreed. Back in the day I saw several military careers go down in flames over affairs. As long has there's no supervisor-subordinate relationship, it always seemed to me that tearing a marriage/family apart was punishment enough, it's just stupid to pile on criminal charges and job loss for sex between consenting adults. That said, Patraeus always seemed to be an arogant horse's ass so haha.
Circular logic. If he wasn't going to lose his job, he'd be less susceptible.
rumraider wrote:
Not sure I understand.
So you're saying he quit because he was responsible (or sacrificed himself as a scapegoat)? Otherwise, he would have remained as CIA Director-in-hump?
