It sometimes has to do with "who am I going to believe, you or my lying' eyes".
People naturally fill in blanks (missing data) to complete a picture and from then on it is fact. Even though it isn't really fact. If you try to confront them with something empirical that contradicts the facts they saw with their own eyes, the empirical data must be skewed or there is some sort of conspiracy. It is natural human behavior. Couple that with a rejection of science as this that or the other and you have a license to live in la la land.
My favorite logic in here is; Wheel is gay. Wheel lives in North Mexico. North Mexicans are gay.
Any policeman will tell you when they interview six people that witnesses a crime you would think there were six separate crimes. To those people what they saw is a fact.
Great goobly goop! Random thoughts by Jack Handy.
Grady Wilson wrote: