The Monte No2 is better, and would recommend over the Petit No2. Reviews overall have not been all that great
cacman wrote:
Cuz he likes the smaller ones between his lips, can't handle the man size.....bahah
rrumba wrote:
Ummm… the Monte No2 is 6.1" x 52rg full-size belicoso compared to the 4.8" x 52rg Petit No2The No2 has received a number of favorable reviews (Google is your friend):http://www.cigarinspector.com/montecristo/montecristo-no-2 http://www.cigars-review.org/Montecristo-Montecristo-No-2.htm Including being considered the No1 cigar in 2013 by CAhttp://www.cigaraficionado.com/cigars/top25detail/year/2013/ IMHO money is better spent on the No2's. If you're looking for a Monte in the Petit vitola I'd highly recommend the Petit Edmundo (4.3" x 52rg) instead. Excellent cigar that's always in my humi.
IMHO money is better spent on the No2's. If you're looking for a Monte in the Petit vitola I'd highly recommend the Petit Edmundo (4.3" x 52rg) instead. Excellent cigar that's always in my humi.
The CigarBid Forums uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close
