DrafterX
10 years ago
The University of Wisconsin-Stout has decided to take down historical paintings that show interactions between white settlers and First Nations people because of their potentially “harmful” effects on students and viewers. The move was sparked by complaints from a diversity group.

One of the paintings shows French fur traders canoeing down the Red Cedar River with American Indians; the other is of a French fort. Both were painted by artist Cal Peters in 1936 and were recently restored with funding by the Wisconsin Historical Society.

After 80 years of decorating the university’s Harvey Hall, the paintings caught the attention of the school’s Diversity Leadership Team (DLT), which complained to the administration that this depiction of First Nations people reinforced racial stereotypes and promoted “acts of domination and oppression.”

After a series of consultations with students, Chancellor Bob Meyer announced the works would removed from the first and second floors of Harvey Hall, as they risked “having a harmful effect on our students and other viewers.”

If the paintings are displayed, it should be in a “controlled gallery space,” he said, with appropriate “context”for viewers. However, the school says that for now, Peters’ works will most likely stay out of public view.

Film at 11.. 🤔





Thanks Obama..!! 😠
opelmanta1900
10 years ago
First nations people? Like cave men?
sd72
10 years ago
No like the swamps of Africa where life began. If you ain't in Africa, you ain't First Nation.
dstieger
10 years ago
http://www.wpr.org/uw-stout-moves-controversial-80-year-old-murals 

Well, those two murals are clearly offensive....huh?

This is pure gold:

UW-Stout Chancellor Bob Meyer said that's been an issue for some students.
"There’s a segment of Native American students, that when they look at the art, to them it symbolizes an era of their history where land and possessions were taken away from them, and they feel bad when they look at them," Meyer said.

By and large, I'm a pretty inclusive, do-no-harm kinda guy....but this is seriously wtf?
Brewha
10 years ago
Wow - so the First National Bank must have been around like a really long time...
tailgater
10 years ago
"harmful effect"

And the left cry foul when we tell them they're wussifying America.


tailgater
10 years ago

Wow - so the First National Bank must have been around like a really long time...

Brewha wrote:



I remember a chick in college. We called her "First National Skank".

Everyone made a deposit.


tailgater
10 years ago
I wonder if she was Indian?


Brewha
10 years ago

I remember a chick in college. We called her "First National Skank".

Everyone made a deposit.


tailgater wrote:


😂




Soooo.... Drafter saw her boobs?
Buckwheat
10 years ago

...

Thanks Obama..!! 😠

DrafterX wrote:



WTF does this have to do with Obama? 🐴 [frypan]
jjanecka
10 years ago
Buckwheat
10 years ago

Everything

jjanecka wrote:



Care to elaborate? With specifics? 🌫
Speyside
10 years ago
So when are we giving back Manhattan?
DrafterX
10 years ago

WTF does this have to do with Obama? 🐴 [frypan]

Buckwheat wrote:




🤣
dstieger
10 years ago

The University of Wisconsin-Stout has decided to take down historical paintings that show interactions between white settlers and First Nations people because of their potentially “harmful” effects on students and viewers. The move was sparked by complaints from a diversity group.

One of the paintings shows French fur traders canoeing down the Red Cedar River with American Indians; the other is of a French fort. Both were painted by artist Cal Peters in 1936 and were recently restored with funding by the Wisconsin Historical Society.

After 80 years of decorating the university’s Harvey Hall, the paintings caught the attention of the school’s Diversity Leadership Team (DLT), which complained to the administration that this depiction of First Nations people reinforced racial stereotypes and promoted “acts of domination and oppression.”

After a series of consultations with students, Chancellor Bob Meyer announced the works would removed from the first and second floors of Harvey Hall, as they risked “having a harmful effect on our students and other viewers.”

If the paintings are displayed, it should be in a “controlled gallery space,” he said, with appropriate “context”for viewers. However, the school says that for now, Peters’ works will most likely stay out of public view.

Film at 11.. 🤔





Thanks Obama..!! 😠

DrafterX wrote:




Just a thought.....but maybe the NFL should consider this approach....if they'd keep the Redskins out of public view, there'd be a lot fewer offended people...and a lot fewer disappointed Skins fans, as well
Mr. Jones
10 years ago
If that painting was an "official W.P.A."
Authorized project during the depression
They can't destroy it without a lot of hassles and red tape and legal battles.
Plus how the F#CK do you move a wall mural??
Big dollars being spent because "one MILLENIAL QUASI-Nazi brownshirt with a chip on their shoulder diversity team leader" on a workstudy free stipend gets a stick up their ARSE???

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AT IT'S DUMBEST AND
SPENDING MONEY FOR NOTHING.

Brewha
10 years ago
I'll have to check with Z, but I think an "Indian Canoe" is like a "Rusty Trombone".

sd72
10 years ago
Manhattan was a square deal. 17 beads, a bottle of fire water, and 4 pelts. It ain't going back
opelmanta1900
10 years ago

I remember a chick in college. We called her "First National Skank".

Everyone made a deposit.


tailgater wrote:



Racist! Wait, no, Sexist!
opelmanta1900
10 years ago

I wonder if she was Indian?


tailgater wrote:



Racist!
Users browsing this topic