If that's true you'd throw them and us under the bus to advance you stereotype of the "redneck" element in the military.
I know the military get hundreds of false claims of soldiers causing destruction and death in Iraq every week. The military compensates people financially for such claims. Almost all go away once the military starts to investigate (because the claims are false).
We do the same thing in peaceful areas (Germany etc) I have talked to guys that have served there that said they saw farmers herding their animals if front of tanks etc to get the money (it seems that the Us military overpays for dead chicken, cows, etc not just toilet seats...).
Your rush to judgment (backed up by your betting that they are guilty with not a shred of evidence) shows an anti troops bias at some level. Why you chose the title "Amerika" show another. Sorry.
Have you ever seen HBO's "Band of Brothers"? If not you should.
There is a scene in which they are taking a small French town. They come to a store front and one soldier is going to throw a grenade in to clear the room before entering. The other soldier kicks open the door and reveals a family hiding on the floor of the shop.
In another scene a soldier hears a noise from a shed in the back courtyard of a building that he had just cleared. He calls out and after no response shots several times at the shed and moves along.
Either of these incidents could have been murders (had the guy thrown the grenade) in Iraq today. So to jump to the conclusion that they are guilty is really unfair. I was in the 82nd airborne for several years. We talked a lot of trash about killing people (even sang songs about it as we ran) but i never met anyone that I thought wanted to kill anyone just for fun or to "get them a raghead".
Maybe your experience is different? I assume you are basing that opinion on some concrete experience or information you have? If not you really need to grow up and think seriously about your stereotypes and biases, and where they come from and why you have them.