JadeRose
8 years ago
.....but that doesn't matter because there was No Collusion (except by Crooked Hillary and the Democrats)!

Actual Tweet by Donald J. Trump. 45th President of the United States.
ZRX1200
8 years ago
DrafterX
8 years ago
Yep... Any Russian contact after the election is cool too... 😟
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
8 years ago
CNN's headlines from an RSS feed... *yawn*


The biggest misconception about the Russia probe is that it will end in some legal proceeding. It won't.

Trump repeats Giuliani defense: 'Collusion is not a crime'

Anderson Cooper breaks down Giuliani's new defense

Analysis: Trump smokescreen fogs up what is fact or fiction

Colbert skewers Giuliani's collusion defense

Analysis: The 37 strangest lines in Giuliani's off-the-rails interview

Lawmaker predicts Trump Jr., Kushner will be indicted

3-D guns: Untraceable and unstoppable?

Gun victim's dad slams 3D-printed guns



Gee, I think these guys might have an agenda... you know, it's not healthy to obsess this much over sh*t... but they know this, and they love their pharmaceutical buddies.


Speyside
8 years ago
He is right. What the DNC and Hillary did to Bernie was despicable. After the Mueller report is released maybe he is not right.
HuckFinn
8 years ago
Collusion isn't a legal term, but the term can be used to describe interactions between a presidential campaign and a foreign government that are illegal under existing statutes, like conspiracy to defraud the US. That's illegal.

Besides, Mueller is supposed to be investigating coordination between the campaign and the Russians. Not collusion.
He's looking in to actual crimes that might have been committed during their alleged 'coordination '.

'Collusion' is just L'Oreal's name for Donald's hair color'.
And why he keeps repeating 'no collusion!' ...probably...maybe....
Theres no figuring out stable geniuses.
frankj1
8 years ago
Willie Shoemaker was a stable genius.
RMAN4443
8 years ago

Willie Shoemaker was a stable genius.

frankj1 wrote:



Exactly...=d>
dstieger
8 years ago
If only he didn't achieve all of his success on the backs of others.....
frankj1
8 years ago
and...they're off.
RMAN4443
8 years ago

Collusion isn't a legal term, but the term can be used to describe interactions between a presidential campaign and a foreign government that are illegal under existing statutes, like conspiracy to defraud the US. That's illegal.

Besides, Mueller is supposed to be investigating coordination between the campaign and the Russians. Not collusion.
He's looking in to actual crimes that might have been committed during their alleged 'coordination '.

'Collusion' is just L'Oreal's name for Donald's hair color'.
And why he keeps repeating 'no collusion!' ...probably...maybe....
Theres no figuring out stable geniuses.

HuckFinn wrote:



Right off the bat,more Bullchit.....:^o or maybe you just spewed without researching?:-k


https://thelawdictionary.org/collusion/ 

https://legaldictionary.lawin.org/collusion/ 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/collusion 

it appears to be a "legal term", at least to the people who know what they're talking about...[-x


HuckFinn
8 years ago

Right off the bat,more Bullchit.....:^o or maybe you just spewed without researching?:-k


https://thelawdictionary.org/collusion/ 

https://legaldictionary.lawin.org/collusion/ 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/collusion 

it appears to be a "legal term", at least to the people who know what they're talking about...[-x


RMAN4443 wrote:


I'd read that Guilliani wasn't mistaken. Collusion is not a crime.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/30/giuliani-is-right-collusion-isnt-a-crime-but-that-wont-help-trump.html 

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/07/12/what-is-collusion-215366 

And read things like

Trump and his lawyers are right that the term “collusion” isn’t a precise one when it comes to U.S. law. But that doesn’t change the potential legal fallout stemming from the Russia investigation, which could touch on laws against computer hacking, election fraud and conspiracy against the United States

RMAN4443
8 years ago

I'd read that Guilliani wasn't mistaken. Collusion is not a crime.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/30/giuliani-is-right-collusion-isnt-a-crime-but-that-wont-help-trump.html 

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/07/12/what-is-collusion-215366 

And read things like

Trump and his lawyers are right that the term “collusion” isn’t a precise one when it comes to U.S. law. But that doesn’t change the potential legal fallout stemming from the Russia investigation, which could touch on laws against computer hacking, election fraud and conspiracy against the United States

HuckFinn wrote:


you said collusion wasn't a "legal term"(BULLCHIT)...it most definitely is a "legal term", that's why it's included in the "LAW" books and dictionaries...
I never said it was "illegal", just correcting your BULLCHIT statement...

You know, your starting to bore me...you make it much to easy...where is the challenge you offered up in some of your previous posts?...I'll have to assume that was just more in a long line of your BULLCHIT....

and I'm "witless and dumb"?...seems like the pot calling the kettle black...:-k
HuckFinn
8 years ago
And...

The term "collusion" is not entirely meaningless – it's in the dictionary, and in an unrelated context (antitrust), it is reasonably well-defined. In the Trump-Russia context, however, it has no legal or other agreed meaning. Worse, centering the word "collusion" leads to irrelevant arguments. Harvard Law School Professor Alan Dershowitz asserts on television that "it is not a crime to collude with a foreign country."
dstieger
8 years ago
Is there anyone who hasn't gone to law school that GAF if collusion is a crime?

If any presidential campaign worked directly with a foreign government to secure an election win, there's a problem. Fluck the law textbooks. And if Trump and his lawyers are leaning on some legal distinction to keep them out of trouble...well, I'm fairly certain he can be impeached if he worked with Russians to help in the election no matter what any law says
HuckFinn
8 years ago

you said collusion wasn't a "legal term"(BULLCHIT)...it most definitely is a "legal term", that's why it's included in the "LAW" books and dictionaries...
I never said it was "illegal", just correcting your BULLCHIT statement...

You know, your starting to bore me...you make it much to easy...where is the challenge you offered up in some of your previous posts?...I'll have to assume that was just more in a long line of your BULLCHIT....

and I'm "witless and dumb"?...seems like the pot calling the kettle black...:-k

RMAN4443 wrote:


Clearly I'm not boring you. You're obsessed with me. I mean my bs.
I'm not gonna continue to trade insults with you. That to me is bs.
I hope that doesn't end up just upsetting you more.
Cause that's not my intention.




frankj1
8 years ago

Clearly I'm not boring you. You're obsessed with me. I mean my bs.
I'm not gonna continue to trade insults with you. That to me is bs.
I hope that doesn't end up just upsetting you more.
Cause that's not my intention.




HuckFinn wrote:


probably a good place to end the hostilities...
fiddler898
8 years ago
Depends on what the definition of "is" is.

Oh, and Rudy hasn’t been "right" for a while now. Regardless of how the word is defined.
HuckFinn
8 years ago

Depends on what the definition of "is" is.

fiddler898 wrote:




It do
Speyside
8 years ago
Dave, stop making sense. This is CBID after all.
Users browsing this topic