Nope, 67-70 is my standard, and my other cigar pals with substantial collections agree.
60-65% is too dry for me, the cigars don't smoke as well. Also I worry about the vital flavor-giving oils evaporating/disappearing over the very long term, because I do such very long-term aging (with how many I have, most will hit 10+ years and many will hit 20+ years before I smoke them).
If a substantial part of the flavorful oils start disappearing in, say:
* 1 year at 40-50% RH (e.g. a cigar left out in the open)
* Never at 70% RH
...then I really don't want to keep cigars for 10-20 years at 60-65% RH. A few years might be fine, but over a very very long term, it seems like there might be loss, and I don't want to end up with "flat", lifeless-tasting cigars.
And before anyone says "age them that long and they WILL be flat and lifeless anyway!", I have never experienced any cigar LOSING quality due to age. Strength gets converted into complexity, but in my experience it's always been a fair trade, regardless of timeframe. If somebody judges "quality" mostly as just strength, then yes they "lose quality", but if you also include (as you should!) complexity and richness of "married" flavors, and not just strength alone, they don't ever lose overall quality in my experience.
.
Pudding Mittens wrote: