Dg west deptford
6 years ago
If sanctuary cities sold Cubans I might be interested otherwise let Trump shut em down
RobertHively
6 years ago

Wrong forum.........noob.

Besides, Mexicans work harder.
Dg west deptford
6 years ago
Mmm, San Andres Mexicans are delicious but I don't need sanctuary cities for them
ZRX1200
6 years ago
Someone sure is a party pooper......day laborers are as close as some of us can get to owning people again.
jjanecka
6 years ago
Go to India ZRX, I'm pretty sure you can still buy people there.
victor809
6 years ago
I mean... He mentioned cigars?
Dg west deptford
6 years ago
Seemed clear to me, but these guys are buying and selling souls... Maybe this is the wrong forum I thought this was a cigar forum not a Democrat slave auction site
victor809
6 years ago
You should go look up tittums... I'm sure you two have lots to talk about
Dg west deptford
6 years ago
Will do, looking to trade and don't wanna risk getting a human in my blind fiver.
midmofan
6 years ago
Actually a Sanctuary City for Cigar Smokers is a good idea.

-No FDA
-No FTC
-No OSHA
-No Cigar Taxes
-No Shipping Restrictions
-CoH deliveries Welcome!
Speyside
6 years ago
I thought conservatives wanted less big government and states to have more self determination. In that regard gun laws and sanctuary cities would both fall under an individual states preview. Can you folks on the right decide what you really want and then apply it uniformly across the board? Yes Victor I realize that implies critical thought so the question in this environment is oxymoronic.
Dg west deptford
6 years ago
Midmofan, couldn't agree more! Accept to add Cubans to that list. Now that would be a real sanctuary
USNGunner
6 years ago

Midmofan, couldn't agree more! Accept to add Cubans to that list. Now that would be a real sanctuary

Dg west deptford wrote:



-CoH deliveries Welcome!



=d>
fiddler898
6 years ago

I thought conservatives wanted less big government and states to have more self determination. In that regard gun laws and sanctuary cities would both fall under an individual states preview. Can you folks on the right decide what you really want and then apply it uniformly across the board? Yes Victor I realize that implies critical thought so the question in this environment is oxymoronic.

Speyside wrote:



I see what you did there. Couldn’t agree more.
USNGunner
6 years ago

I thought conservatives wanted less big government and states to have more self determination. In that regard gun laws and sanctuary cities would both fall under an individual states preview. Can you folks on the right decide what you really want and then apply it uniformly across the board? Yes Victor I realize that implies critical thought so the question in this environment is oxymoronic.

Speyside wrote:



Wrong forums noobs! [frypan]

Spey, we do, and I'm actually with you on this. I'm the original you can't freaking have it both ways. Goose, gander, all that nonsense.

Although the state of Illiniois and it's quaint "home rule state" when it's convenient has kind of put me off that particular gem to be honest. But State's rights over federal rights all the way baby. =d>


victor809
6 years ago

I thought conservatives wanted less big government and states to have more self determination. In that regard gun laws and sanctuary cities would both fall under an individual states preview. Can you folks on the right decide what you really want and then apply it uniformly across the board? Yes Victor I realize that implies critical thought so the question in this environment is oxymoronic.

Speyside wrote:



heck.... more futile than anything. 🙂
ZRX1200
6 years ago
You two are something.....

I love to see “intelligent” people ignore nuance and context, very inspiring to see when showing judgement on a direct behavior were seen from others.
Users browsing this topic