and to reinforce that point Spey, faced with all that, a couple of months after the pandemic was known to be here, we still do not not have a consensus that the best thing to do was to do mass testing as quickly as possible to gather data to effectively "control" the spread, by IDing and quarantining infected peeps and figuring out the areas where the virus lives.....
my personal opinion is that we should have, but were not ready to do it for whatever reason, so we wasted time and an opportunity...
then, we had to switch our efforts to "contain"...my personal opinion is that this is a good idea, but that opinion is driven by my proximity to a densely populated metropolitan area flowing with international travelers...a place where the risk of interacting with a carrier is vastly greater than someone who lives in a rural area, where the closest known carrier is several hundred miles away...seems there are still many peeps who don't think that staying home applies to them, posing a risk to those who stay at home...
but that was what Italy thought, so they only closed off the northern part of the country...didn't take long to realize that was a fatal mistake...so there is actual data that shows that shutting down the society can slow the spread and save lives
delta1 wrote: