Meh.... not significantly different than the anti-wallstreet protests a decade ago. Not going to effectively achieve much, but not really doing a ton of damage either.

victor809 wrote:

You know, except those 4 shootings and 2 homicides... and the countless businesses complaining they've had to close down... but no actual damage...

opelmanta1900 wrote:

Not sure I buy that. Why would businesses be forced to shut down because there are people in front of them? Sorta what you want as a business.

And the shootings? Big meh there. Depending on the location, that's fewer people shot than moving protests. Last I saw (which was a bit ago) they didn't know whether they were involved in the CHOP, or if they were those wild and crazy boobaloo boys or what.

victor809 wrote:

Not sure I buy that. Why would businesses be forced to shut down because there are people in front of them? Sorta what you want as a business.

And the shootings? Big meh there. Depending on the location, that's fewer people shot than moving protests. Last I saw (which was a bit ago) they didn't know whether they were involved in the CHOP, or if they were those wild and crazy boobaloo boys or what.

victor809 wrote:

You know, except those 4 shootings and 2 homicides... and the countless businesses complaining they've had to close down... but no actual damage...

opelmanta1900 wrote:

Not sure I buy that. Why would businesses be forced to shut down because there are people in front of them? Sorta what you want as a business.

And the shootings? Big meh there. Depending on the location, that's fewer people shot than moving protests. Last I saw (which was a bit ago) they didn't know whether they were involved in the CHOP, or if they were those wild and crazy boobaloo boys or what.

victor809 wrote:

Yeah! Who wouldn't want a bunch of protesters with time and guns on their hands and no jobs hanging outside of their businesses all day! Those businesses having probably raked in so much cash they are all going to retire now!

CelticBomber wrote: