DrafterX
5 years ago
Hillary Clinton weighed in on former President Donald Trump's second impeachment trial this week, suggesting in a tweet that if the Senate ultimately votes to acquit him, it will only be because "the jury includes his co-conspirators."

"If Senate Republicans fail to convict Donald Trump, it won't be because the facts were with him or his lawyers mounted a competent defense," Clinton, the former secretary of state, tweeted Wednesday morning. "It will be because the jury includes his co-conspirators."



[-( 🤐
delta1
5 years ago
Hillary: STFU!!!



















but she's right, you know...
DrafterX
5 years ago
Smooth light
5 years ago
ESND...helldog
RayR
5 years ago
Hillary is the last lizard 🦎 person that should be talking about co-conspirators.
Speyside
5 years ago
Everytime Hillary opens her mouth a lesbian somewhere shudders in fear.
delta1
5 years ago
Hillary was right...

just as Hillary said: several GOP Senators (Cruz, Graham, Lee) who have sworn an oath to be impartial jurors in the impeachment trial of Trump, have decided to meet behind closed doors with Trump's defense attorneys in order to plan strategy for his defense...


looks and smells bad, but sadly, their constituents are likely supportive of that "unusual" move
frankj1
5 years ago
but, but, re-election!
cowards.
Stogie1020
5 years ago

Hillary was right...

just as Hillary said: several GOP Senators (Cruz, Graham, Lee) who have sworn an oath to be impartial jurors in the impeachment trial of Trump, have decided to meet behind closed doors with Trump's defense attorneys in order to plan strategy for his defense...


looks and smells bad, but sadly, their constituents are likely supportive of that "unusual" move

delta1 wrote:



Were you pissed at how Shifty Schiff conducted the collusion hoax hearing behind closed doors with no Trump reps present? I mean, if we are going to have 'outrage standards' they should be equally applied, no?

So, does meeting behind closed doors with only one side of an issue negate one's ability to be impartial or not?
DrafterX
5 years ago
Hate Trump or you're a criminal.. 😟
Smooth light
5 years ago
Were do you sign up for the...
CRIMINAL HATER CLUB...Is that the Booth beside the,HATE THE USA ORGANIZATION.🇺🇳
teedubbya
5 years ago
Shift wasn’t a juror collaborating with the defense or the prosecution. It’s nowhere near equivalent and no where near absolving current bad behavior.

If you want a real equivalent I do think some dem senators have also been talking with the house impeachment team along the way. Both wrong in my view but some only see the other side doing wrong while they willfully suck their guys smegma covered cox. Disgusting.

Be outraged all you want about shift, I don’t see anyone defending him certainly not me, but don’t use it to hide or justify what is going on now.

If you are cool with bs being done by your side because you just want your side to win at all cost no matter what is really right or wrong just admit it. Don’t pretend or fall back on the diversionary talking points developed by those that do have that mentality. Many are blindly following those they profess to dislike. Wrong is wrong full stop.

In here we are real, good people not political scum. How do we get sucked so far in to one side or the other that we are willing to play their game and support the absurd?

We need to snap out of it.
RayR
5 years ago
I can't believe anyone could be that naïve to believe a juror, especially a party partisan could be impartial. Everyone is biased going in and it would take a major piece of damning evidence to the contrary to change their mind.
izonfire
5 years ago

Shift wasn’t a juror collaborating with the defense or the prosecution. It’s nowhere near equivalent and no where near absolving current bad behavior.

If you want a real equivalent I do think some dem senators have also been talking with the house impeachment team along the way. Both wrong in my view but some only see the other side doing wrong while they willfully suck their guys smegma covered cox. Disgusting.
.................................

teedubbya wrote:


Why does it always end up with smegma covered cox with you???
teedubbya
5 years ago
We all look at life through our own filter izon. Drafter sees hairy Mayo dripping bungholes.
ZRX1200
5 years ago
To be fair I think DrafterX also sees bacon and tomatoes 😟
delta1
5 years ago

Were you pissed at how Shifty Schiff conducted the collusion hoax hearing behind closed doors with no Trump reps present? I mean, if we are going to have 'outrage standards' they should be equally applied, no?

So, does meeting behind closed doors with only one side of an issue negate one's ability to be impartial or not?

Stogie1020 wrote:



another con myth popularly recited ...

they were invited to attend, but refused...

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/01/false-and-misleading-claims-at-impeachment-trial/ 


in some cases subpoenas were issued compelling Trump/member of his administration to attend but they were ignored...cons were OK with that thumbing of the nose at the rule of law


teedubbya
5 years ago
Drafter still likes hairy but holes though right? 😟
frankj1
5 years ago

I can't believe anyone could be that naïve to believe a juror, especially a party partisan could be impartial. Everyone is biased going in and it would take a major piece of damning evidence to the contrary to change their mind.

RayR wrote:


the same people you trash daily, now you think flourish in your system... Biased?
Not possible. It's all love and fairness without rules and laws.

Human nature.
Users browsing this topic