TeeDubbya promised me that this was a Trump organized insurrection with outside support from Norway and their Viking commandos.

HockeyDad wrote:

The FBI has found....What a joke.

The only thing they would find is that they themselves-the FBI- together with pelosi did all they possibly could to facilitate an embarrassment to themselves & the useful idiots like Chewbacca Q shaman guy.

We needed an investigation for that?

Any further investigation would expose the corrupt DNC operatives at the helm of the whole affair.

Just imagine if all the records of that day & leading up to were released!
I've seen enough to know the obvious.

Just like the election.
An obvious scam.

Insurrection.... Lol! People believe this propaganda!!!

Pitiful!

Dg west deptford wrote:

You watched it CB? Did you see his whole speech or the “highlights”?

ZRX1200 wrote:

I watched the speech and I watched the violence but, if I didn't does that change what happened? A violent attack on the government. That's all an insurrection is. That's what happened. You can blame whomever you want, blame it on a stolen election or a morons speech blah blah blah. None of that matters when it comes to calling it what it is. A group of people violently attacked a joint session of Congress trying to prevent the formal counting of the electoral vote. A vote required by our Constitution, that would officially make Joe Biden the President-elect. It was an insurrection. Don't know why that's so hard for people to accept. It's an important point. If we refuse to acknowledge what happened then we ignore how we got there.

Why have goal posts at all if we can just move them every time someone scores a point.

CelticBomber wrote:

Anything worthy of the name INSURRECTION should exhibit a possible chance of actually being successful or why even bother. Now we all know that even if that group all had guns there was no chance they were going to walk out of there victorious. Without being armed it was merely an exercise in futility. Hell, they could have zapped every congress member and in a few days we'd have a ton of AOC wannabees lined up to lead the nation. Admittedly, it was a dumb move politically as it played right into the hands of the democrats. Below you see the definition of the word insurrection. Do you see " open revolt against civil authority or a constituted government"? BLM and Antifa staged open revolts against the police (local and federal) for a year. Are the police not civil authority? Are BLM and Antifa then not guilty of insurrection? Was the Boston Tea Party an insurrection? Based on the US Code it appears that anybody who rebels against a US law is guilty. What is the difference between a violent protest, rebelling and an insurrection? What was it when Weather Underground and other groups blew up federal buildings? If we are going to embrace loose definitions for one group, why not others? In my eyes anything short of an armed insurrection should have a different name. Democrat justice has the blindfold pulled away on one eye.

18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

in•sur•rec•tion ĭn″sə-rĕk′shən►

n.
The act or an instance of open revolt against civil authority or a constituted government.
n.
A rising up; uprising.
n.
The act of rising against civil authority or governmental restraint; specifically, the armed resistance of a number of persons to the power of the state; incipient or limited rebellion.

CamoRoon wrote:

I watched the speech and I watched the violence but, if I didn't does that change what happened? A violent attack on the government. That's all an insurrection is. That's what happened. You can blame whomever you want, blame it on a stolen election or a morons speech blah blah blah. None of that matters when it comes to calling it what it is. A group of people violently attacked a joint session of Congress trying to prevent the formal counting of the electoral vote. A vote required by our Constitution, that would officially make Joe Biden the President-elect. It was an insurrection. Don't know why that's so hard for people to accept. It's an important point. If we refuse to acknowledge what happened then we ignore how we got there.

Why have goal posts at all if we can just move them every time someone scores a point.

CelticBomber wrote: