The Trump whisperer has no legal basis to defy a subpoena.

WSJ Editorial Board
The challenge in polarized political times is to keep your eye on democratic institutions and their proper authority. That’s the reason to applaud the nine House Republicans who voted last week to hold Steve Bannon, the sometime Donald Trump counselor, in contempt for defying a Congressional subpoena.

The subpoena was issued by the special committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, and there are no doubt some partisan motives at play. Speaker Nancy Pelosi hopes the committee will find evidence to back up her claim that the riot was part of a larger plot to stage an “insurrection.” If so, it was the dumbest coup attempt in history, but the committee wants to ask Mr. Bannon about his role.

Mr. Bannon’s claim of executive privilege has no legal merit. The Supreme Court has said the privilege applies to conversations with a President performing the responsibilities of his office or making policy or decisions. Mr. Bannon left the White House staff in the summer of 2017. He has no immunity as a private citizen who may have spoken with then President Trump.

The House voted to hold him in criminal contempt, 229-202, with all but nine Republicans in opposition. Congress has referred the contempt citation to the Justice Department for possible criminal prosecution.

The U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia will have to decide whether to prosecute, and doing so would save Congress’s enforcement power from becoming a dead letter. That power has withered in recent decades as members of both parties have refused to cooperate with Congressional investigations.

Republicans held official Lois Lerner in contempt in their probe of IRS bias, but Justice never prosecuted. We count at least four times in recent years that Congress made criminal contempt referrals, and none was prosecuted. If Mr. Bannon becomes another, everyone will assume that Congressional subpoenas have no force.

One Member of Congress who seems to get this is Rep. Nancy Mace, the first-term Republican from Charleston, S.C. She voted against impeaching Mr. Trump twice. But she voted to hold Mr. Bannon in contempt on grounds that she wants a subpoena to mean something when Republicans are in the majority, as they could be as soon as 2023. Partisanship should matter less on this point than the preservation of Congress’s power to investigate issues and the executive branch.

Congress also has its own inherent contempt power and could jail Mr. Bannon on its own until he testifies. Had the GOP taken that step against Ms. Lerner, the House special committee would be in a stronger position today.

Mr. Bannon has a Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself if he does testify. But he doesn’t have the right to defy a subpoena with impunity. President Biden blundered when he interfered with a prosecutorial decision by saying publicly that Justice should prosecute Mr. Bannon. Mr. Biden has since admitted his mistake.

Either Congress itself or Justice has good reason to vindicate Congress’s subpoena power under Article I. Republicans will be grateful when they’re back in power.

Hold him in contempt...what are they gonna do?


LET'S GO BRANDON!!!

#FJB

Lock him up !

I have a lot of contempt for Congress. Come get me!

LET'S GO BRANDON!!!


Actually, I think they should arrest all those congressmen that have shown contempt for their oath to the Constitution.
That should pretty much empty out most of the House and the Senate.

Bannon is headed to federal prison...
Hope he likeS DUEcE SPuNK...
PURTY sure the orange DON can't guarantee a Lewisburg country club assignment for him anyMoRe...

Good luck with that, this is just another congressional chit show by a contemptible congress.

WHO IS RAY EPPS?
LET'S GO BRANDON!

Tucker Carlson Has Triggered The Fourth Branch of Government With His Preview of “The Patriot Purge”

October 29, 2021



"All speech the communists do not like is called violence."

"All violence the communists support is called speech."

Who Dominates viewership but not pay? ,
knows he's scaring off his advertising sponsors but his balls are bigger than that?

Thinking about signing up to stream the Patriot Purge.

Jones, you better not watch it because doing so prolly gets you on a NSA SSG gangstalk list.

How long do you think we have with free speech?

Good for Tucker, it is terrible how mean & insensitive he can be toward lieing, smug, groupthinking, pompous ideologues though.
I feel bad for how angry he makes them.

WHO IS RAY EPPS?

He made another lying, smug, group-thinking, pompous ideologue angry at him.

Turns Out Alexander Vindman Is The Dopey Hack We All Thought He Was

The man behind the failed Ukraine impeachment saga has no idea what free speech is or why it's protected by the U.S. Constitution.



"All speech the communists do not like is called violence."

"All violence the communists support is called speech."

How does someone like Vindman become a U.S. Army lieutenant colonel?!

Serious people have to be laughing at the rotteness of our whole system

And they wanna hold Bannon in contempt?

If a "cheap beer and convenience store burrito" fart ever somehow took human form, you'd get Steve Bannon.

LOL!!!

You’re not wrong…

Lock him up!