https://www.news4jax.com/news/florida/2022/01/14/desantis-florida-wont-enforce-health-care-worker-vaccination-requirement/

Interesting to see how this plays out.

Speyside2 wrote:

I have many jokes about unemployed people. Sadly none of them work

Sunoverbeach wrote:

I have no problem with states telling the feds to fk off with rules they don't agree with. Going against scotus though... there are rules to this sh*t, whether you like the rules or not.

I'm interested in how it plays out as well.

bgz wrote:

Reading about the supreme court’s ruling that Senile Joe’s attempt to dictate injections of unknown chemical substances into the bodies of all employees of businesses with more than 100 employees (Repeat after me: “Our Bodies, Our Choice!”) is a no go, one thing stood out. According to news reports, the court’s argument was that yes, Congress has given OSHA vast regulatory powers, but not this one.

This suggests that anything is “constitutional” as long as a majority of Congress says so and the current president agrees. So all Congress now has to do, as long as the Pelosi/Schumer crime families are in charge, is to add a rider to say, a farm bill, that gives OSHA the power to administer forced injections of mysterious, unknown chemicals into every resident of the U.S. One wonders what James Madison would think of this.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/black-robed-deities-ignore-the-constitution-again/ 

Which explains the incessant jokes.

bgz wrote:

It's NULLIFICATION Spey2! The HORROR of it HUH? It must make you MAD!🤬

Nullify all unconstitutional federal dicktates! Tell em' to stick it up their arse!

RayR wrote:

https://www.news4jax.com/news/florida/2022/01/14/desantis-florida-wont-enforce-health-care-worker-vaccination-requirement/

Interesting to see how this plays out.

Speyside2 wrote:

The SCOTUS is the feds. The SCOTUS is political, the SCOTUS makes opinions, they can't enforce laws and can not make laws.

“The States then being the parties to the constitutional compact, and in their sovereign capacity, it follows of necessity, that there can be no tribunal above their authority, to decide in the last resort, whether the compact made by them [the Constitution] be violated; and consequently that as the parties to it, they must themselves decide in the last resort, such questions as may be of sufficient magnitude to require their interposition.” - James Madison

Black-Robed Deities Ignore the Constitution Again
Thomas DiLorenzo

RayR wrote:

Who do you believe has the authority too disregard SCOTUS rulings and from where/what is such authority derived?

rfenst wrote:

The federal government today can wage wars without the consent of our congressional representatives, overthrow foreign governments, tax nearly half of national income, abolish civil liberty in the name of "homeland security" and "the war on drugs," legalize and endorse infanticide ("partial-birth abortion"), regulate nearly every aspect of our existence, and there’s little or nothing we can do about it. "Write your congressman" is the refrain of the slave to the state who doesn’t even realize he’s a slave (thanks to decades of government school brainwashing).

But Americans were not always slaves to federal tyranny. Perhaps the best illustration of this is how Americans once utilized the Jeffersonian, states’ rights traditions of nullification and interposition to assist President Andrew Jackson in his campaign to veto the re-chartering of the Second Bank of the United States (BUS) in 1832. Jackson essentially ended central banking in America until it was revived thirty years later by the Lincoln administration. The story is told in James J. Kilpatrick’s wonderful 1957 book, The Sovereign States: Notes of a Citizen of Virginia.

The Bank was notorious for fraud, mismanagement, corruption, and attempts to engineer a "political business cycle." Prior to 1861, the American people were still sovereign over their government. They exercised that sovereignty in the way the founders intended: through state political conventions or legislatures. The federal government was their agent.

More...

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2003/05/thomas-dilorenzo/states-rights-vs-tyranny/ 

Nobody is completely useless. You can always be used as a bad example

Sunoverbeach wrote:

RayR @ #16

Please just answer the question in your own words (no links or quotes from any one).

I want to know your personal thoughts off the top of your head, without you doing any research, or posting any links or quotes; no matter how long or short your answer may be and without ad hominem abusive so that I am not distracted by it.

I think this will help me better understand where you are "coming from."

rfenst wrote: