All forms of government are actually autocracy. They may have very different goals, but those goals never take into consideration what the people as a while want.

RayR is inherently correct, government is inherently corrupt/bad. Unfortunatly his anarchistic utopia only exists in theory. In reality there must be some inimalistic form of government. All laws should reflect the constitution and the will of the people.

I am looking for constructive criticism. Don't hold back

Azzwhile

Ray Ray

Cray cray

Is what 98.2% of Cbid demoncrats say....

Ah, sorry Z, this would take critical thought on your part. Let me simplify for you. All government bad. Money run all government. Anarchy idea good. Anarchy no work. What you say?

Arguments are in room 12A

Critical thought like spelling?

I can hear your yelling in room 12A from upstairs.

Yes, it's true Jonsey. Cbid demoncrats hate any mention of gubment being in chains.
It leaves them speechless, choking on their cigar and babbling nonsense.

Spey is trying to instigate an intellectual argument. Good luck with that.
I'm not sure about his starting point, he fails first by inserting the assertion that anything that crushes centralized gubment rule one way or another won't work, he says anarchism is Utopian. It won't work he says. I guess the same applies to libertarians, classical liberals, and old-right conservatives.
At the same time, he advocates for a minimalistic form of government that reflects the constitution and the will of the people. I thought that was the framework left by the founders who were not Utopian and knew that humans were easily corruptible and violent, that there were those that are always seeking more centralized power and the perks that go with it.
Many instinctively knew it wouldn't last as the republic grew in territory and population. Some counted on it because they were the dedicated archists who were seeking dominion over the states and the people. Words on a piece of paper and the "will of the people " called democracy were easily corrupted to their favor.

LOL.

If Queen Elizabeth accidentally farts during dinner, the other guests are supposed to pretend like nothing happened. Noble gases should have no reaction.

I went to A12 for an argument and all they did was contradict me. That's not an argument!

Tell ya what Z, your spelling and grammar are far better than mine. I admit this readily. What that has to do with critical thinking? For all I know you are an idiot savant.

Yes it is...

Ideally, you should leave Tom Brady out of this.

Wow! This thread quickly devolved into passing gas faster than I thought. 💤

Are you happy Spey?

No it’s not.

Ray, show me a country where anarchism is practiced and works. Actually aside from what I consider inaccurate observations of who I am, you are the only person to pose an answer to my thoughts.

Unfortunately once Z posted it turned to chit. My bad in a way. I am tired of his smugness and superior attitude if you disagree with him. He is a classic example of an internet bully. At this point in time I choose to mix it up with him.

For instance, lack of spelling skills implies poor English, guilty as charged. To think spelling skill implies you think critically or are smart points to a low IQ range.

that's more like silly banter...🌫

I didn’t imply anything.

I took your spelling as an opportunity to call you a name in a clever way as a joke…….I wasn’t bullying anyone and I publicly apologize if you felt that way. I will be better and watch how I communicate with people and be more def aware of my own behavior.

1 outta 2 ain’t bad anyways.

To late, you've already been reported to Kamalalala and her Cyber Bully and Misinformation Squad

Oh know!