I dunno, Joe. I saw her, and it seems to me those locked onto the steering wheel grab story are the ones running with it as though it was the point of her testimony under oath.
She clearly differentiated between what others told her and what she saw and heard in person.
And under threat of perjury, she testified that she saw and heard a lot of stuff for Americans to ponder.

As have many other Trump appointees and current supporters.

The important points being sifted through are not little isolated tantrums...con news services are burying the story if what I read hear daily is accurate.
Lib news services are apparently glorifying selected items, if what I read hear is accurate.

I just kinda been trying to catch what I can live or replayed and use my ability to filter out opinions from printed coverage etc.

frankj1 wrote:

I know you want to believe Ben, your TDS won't allow any alternative. 🤨

RayR wrote:

Is there anyone who believes her story about Trump lunging, grabbing the steering wheel and choking out a SS agent?

Anyone?



Now Liz Cheney "welcomes" the agents to testify under oath? Really?
AFTER we heard biased hearsay the committee would "welcome" this? Why not take that path to begin with?

This is the pure definition of a kangaroo court. The committee has a preconceived ruling and is trying to find a route that leads them to it.

I know, I know: orange man bad.

But holy chit. It would take a complete moron to suspend reality long enough to think this in ANY way is presenting facts.


And the media?
They ran with the hearsay on every outlet.
The same media who not too long ago refused to mention the words "laptop" and "hunter" in the same sentence because the story was not yet corroborated.

Yet millions of leftists and dozens of others sit entranced by this spectacle that Pelosi's congress is prancing in front of us.


Back to the main point.
Trump. Lunging? From the back seat of a partitioned limo to the front seat? And grabbing the wheel? Or grabbing the throat of a trained officer?
All said with a straight face.

Rachel madcow would be proud.

tailgater wrote:

I dunno, Joe. I saw her, and it seems to me those locked onto the steering wheel grab story are the ones running with it as though it was the point of her testimony under oath.
She clearly differentiated between what others told her and what she saw and heard in person.
And under threat of perjury, she testified that she saw and heard a lot of stuff for Americans to ponder.

As have many other Trump appointees and current supporters.

The important points being sifted through are not little isolated tantrums...con news services are burying the story if what I read hear daily is accurate.
Lib news services are apparently glorifying selected items, if what I read hear is accurate.

I just kinda been trying to catch what I can live or replayed and use my ability to filter out opinions from printed coverage etc.

frankj1 wrote:

You forget, these are the intellectuals that elected our sh*t show of a president and want to burn the country down.

Burner02 wrote: