This isn’t going to end well at this pace, and you’re going to have people willing to burn it to change direction.

ZRX1200 wrote:

There's people on both sides that want to burn it down.

Most of them are poor

bgz wrote:

Right and who systematically legislates to keep people there?

The reasonable D’s and R’s.

ZRX1200 wrote:

I think a lot of people are tired of “reasonable” RepubliCANTS and that’s a major factor in why we got Cheeto in the first place. “Reasonable” republicans haven’t shown strength in their beliefs and found compromise where reasonable. They’ve caved time after time for tax dollars and for promises to stay in DC and I think there are many who are just exhausted of the same old. And the lack of acknowledgment of the war footing a portion of the left is on, you CANNOT focus on compromise when the starting points of negotiations are a constantly moving goal post on one side.

What you saying sounds great but I think is ignoring an ugly truth that is really uncomfortable to face. This isn’t going to end well at this pace, and you’re going to have people willing to burn it to change direction.

ZRX1200 wrote:

8track for President!

frankj1 wrote:

Poor people don’t matter as long as we keep them fat, drunk, stoned, and stupid.

HockeyDad wrote:

I think a lot of people are tired of “reasonable” RepubliCANTS and that’s a major factor in why we got Cheeto in the first place. “Reasonable” republicans haven’t shown strength in their beliefs and found compromise where reasonable. They’ve caved time after time for tax dollars and for promises to stay in DC and I think there are many who are just exhausted of the same old. And the lack of acknowledgment of the war footing a portion of the left is on, you CANNOT focus on compromise when the starting points of negotiations are a constantly moving goal post on one side.

What you saying sounds great but I think is ignoring an ugly truth that is really uncomfortable to face. This isn’t going to end well at this pace, and you’re going to have people willing to burn it to change direction.

ZRX1200 wrote:

Ask yourself, other than mean tweets... why do they hate him?

He's an a-hole, ain't no doubt about it. But had he not been attacked mercilessly (mostly with lies) from the jump, might he have been a little more "presidential"?

I don't want him to run again, at this point, not because I think he'd be bad but because I think the fkn swamp would never, ever allow him to win again. That was painfully obvious the second time around.

The first time around they gave him no shot... and when he won they did everything in their power with the help of the mainstream media narrative to ensure he wouldn't last. He did. Then they did everything to ensure he couldn't win again.

MACS wrote:

Is it so unreasonable for a moderate Independent ran for president?
If it is far left vs far right, that leaves a lot of bird in the middle.
If it HAS to be a Republican vs a Democrat, how about the both come from the center of the party.

It’s not like either red or flue extremists are going to not vote for the slightly faded jersey they have loved for the other hue.

Boggles my mind or short sighted and willfully blind with no situational awareness people are.

Although maybe I’m the idiot.

8trackdisco wrote:

He just lies to everyone's face over and over again despite yuge evidence... And everyone with a half a brain can watch and listen to him and know he's a narcissistic lying sh*t bag.

Every once in a while someone comes along and tells people what they want to hear regardless of whether it's true or not...

And they try to sell you something.

Already heard the pitch... Didn't buy it the first time either... Or the 2nd... 3rd... Etc...

bgz wrote: